| Author |
Message |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | If it's a cover contribution it's always helpful for the voters and the screeners to point out what's better on the new one. (Was posted by some other user in another thread, but I really think this is a good idea, so I "stole" this) With this information it's a lot of easier to see the improvments. (But never is a garant for an approvment)  |
|
| Registered: October 3, 2008 |  Posts: 260 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Yeah... cover scans make all the difference in the world. They are so subjective that there is no reason to be concerned about them. What I do is if it goes through great... if not... that is fine too... I just lock mine locally and move on (as I obviously like mine better if I try to change it). Ah yes cover scans. i personally would like to use ALL my scans, not that they are better but just because they are mine!  but really i dont have a problem with scans where the "reddish hue" is off or things of that nature. as long as the dvd pic looks good in my online collection im cool. i'll change others in my local collection(like i have a Ichabod and mr. toad dvd from the disney movie club which came with a cool headless horseman slip cover! i already owned the dvd, bought it again just for that!! that scan HAS to be in my local collection!!)  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 81 |
| | Posted: | | | | when i submitted my cover scan there was NO COVER SCAN in the db. it was a listing that was blank from pre-release info. |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting scottiew: Quote:
when i submitted my cover scan there was NO COVER SCAN in the db. it was a listing that was blank from pre-release info. Was the UPC matching? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,330 |
| | Posted: | | | | If there wasn't one existing... then how did you get a no vote saying that they preferred the existing? if they preferred the existing there must have been one there. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | That does seem odd. The only thing I can think of is that there was another contribution pending, when he made his, and it was accepted first. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,330 |
| | Posted: | | | | That makes sense. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,293 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
If there wasn't one existing... then how did you get a no vote saying that they preferred the existing? if they preferred the existing there must have been one there. If there is a profile but no scan I think a new scan will still allow anyone with that profile to vote, like any other non-scan update to the profile. | | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,201 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
If there wasn't one existing... then how did you get a no vote saying that they preferred the existing? if they preferred the existing there must have been one there.
If there is a profile but no scan I think a new scan will still allow anyone with that profile to vote, like any other non-scan update to the profile. Except that scottiew said he got a no vote with the comment, "one no vote just said the existing looked better." That no vote makes no sense if there wasn't an existing scan. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 906 |
| | Posted: | | | | True, but why would anyone say that they prefer no scan before a new scan
EDIT: Martian beat me to it. | | | 
The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,330 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
If there wasn't one existing... then how did you get a no vote saying that they preferred the existing? if they preferred the existing there must have been one there.
If there is a profile but no scan I think a new scan will still allow anyone with that profile to vote, like any other non-scan update to the profile.
Except that scottiew said he got a no vote with the comment, "one no vote just said the existing looked better." That no vote makes no sense if there wasn't an existing scan. Exactly... but like you said... Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
That does seem odd. The only thing I can think of is that there was another contribution pending, when he made his, and it was accepted first. It is the only thing that I can think of that makes sense. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | If we would knew the UPC it would be easy to have clearness if there was an existing or not. (Perhaps as guessed: Approved, but not releesed at time of contibuting) | | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
|