Another contribution has appeared - it is riddled with errors - AGAIN.
I might be a bit anal about this, but why would a contributor not bother to check an overview submission to ensure all errors are eradicated. Otherwise we are leaving it to another user to fix all these problems???

UPC: 786936-227130
Contributors notes - Overview edited for em dash

Firstly, what a pointless sole amendment, even worse than a genre change.

3 errors found with quick glance at overview;
Father Of The Bride should be capitalised
straitlaced incorrectly spelt as straight-laced
sister should be in italics

I just think a No vote could help make the data more correct if voter lists the errors and contributor reacts positively?

A PM is appropriate, abusing your voting privileges is NOT.PERIOD, richie. If you are man enough to deal via PM then fine I will fix what you wish, if you aren't then I will simply say you are abusing the Rules and your voting privileges and i will point this behavior out to the screeners every time. Your call, not mine. I will only say grow up.

Skip

Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting richierich:

Quote:
I just think a No vote could help make the data more correct if voter lists the errors and contributor reacts positively?

Indeed. Vote no and include your reason. You are not obligated to PM nor are you called upon to vote yes with a comment.

Yeah, James, just ignore the Rules. They don't count, you make them as you go along anyway.

Skip

Kathy:

I might be inclined to agre with you under normal circumstances. BUT, just as with another user who behaves in the same manner, once the issue is corrected I seldom have seen him return to vote Yes. Now to me to me that speaks to the user having an agenda or a vendetta. In fact the other user recently had an issue simply with notes and once the notes were edited, he did not change his vote to Yes, he changed it to Neutral. I am simply reading the behavior of these two users in the context of their NO votes and refusal to then vote YES. I therefore view their behavior as an abuse of their voting privileges and will respond accordingly re: the screeners.If nothing else, even IF i presume that their behavior is not that of an agenda or a vendetta, it is at the very least highly disrespectful and that is behavior that is unacceptable. This whole poll is simply that he got upset because I have started pointing out his behavior as unacceptable, if he wishes to be more respectful then I have no problem with him, but don't piss on my pants and tell me it's raining. It's a two way street, f you want to meet me halfway fine, otherwise...well to put it bluntly...take long walk off a short pier. I have had enough of being abused for the disgusting behavior of others and I will grant them the SAME respect or lack thereof that they grant me.

Clearly, to me richie is not interested in treating people with respect, he simply wants to be able to run amuck and make up his own Rules, and when he gets called on it, instead of dealing with someone respectfully he brings it here and whines. No I won't play his game, thank you very much, i have enough of the disrespect.

Skip

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
I have had enough of being abused for the disgusting behavior of others and I will grant them the SAME respect or lack thereof that they grant me.

Skip

Maybe thats how others feel about you?  As a long time lurker I find you are an impossible person.  No matter what the query, the question or anything you come across as someone who just starts to randomly CAPITALISE to get THEIR opinions ACROSS in a typically UNFRIENDLY manner.  You ruin the forums for me.

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Time to LOCK this thread, NOW.

Skip

See what I mean with the unfriendly manner and random capitalisation?

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

I might be inclined to agre with you under normal circumstances. BUT, just as with another user who behaves in the same manner, once the issue is corrected I seldom have seen him return to vote Yes. Now to me to me that speaks to the user having an agenda or a vendetta. In fact the other user recently had an issue simply with notes and once the notes were edited, he did not change his vote to Yes, he changed it to Neutral. I am simply reading the behavior of these two users in the context of their NO votes and refusal to then vote YES. I therefore view their behavior as an abuse of their voting privileges and will respond accordingly re: the screeners.If nothing else, even IF i presume that their behavior is not that of an agenda or a vendetta, it is at the very least highly disrespectful and that is behavior that is unacceptable. This whole poll is simply that he got upset because I have started pointing out his behavior as unacceptable, if he wishes to be more respectful then I have no problem with him, but don't piss on my pants and tell me it's raining. It's a two way street, f you want to meet me halfway fine, otherwise...well to put it bluntly...take long walk off a short pier. I have had enough of being abused for the disgusting behavior of others and I will grant them the SAME respect or lack thereof that they grant me.

Skip

If you want to look for vendettas, agendas, and abusive behavior, look to your own contribution notes that you personalize with libelous drivel to attack anyone who dares to vote 'no' against your contributions.

I won't vote 'yes' to a user who abuses me in this manner. I will not condone your behavior. If you want to fix the situation, start with yourself.

Quoting samuelrichardscott:

Quote:
Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
I have had enough of being abused for the disgusting behavior of others and I will grant them the SAME respect or lack thereof that they grant me.

Skip

Maybe thats how others feel about you?  As a long time lurker I find you are an impossible person.  No matter what the query, the question or anything you come across as someone who just starts to randomly CAPITALISE to get THEIR opinions ACROSS in a typically UNFRIENDLY manner.  You ruin the forums for me.

You aren't the only one, I promise you.