| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | | I see two ways that this is entered into the database.
Super Duper Cut or Super Duper $@%!#& Cut.
Which is correct? |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | Depends on what exactly is on the cover. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well it depends on what one thinks is a part of the edition and isn't.  |
|
  | Eagle | | Registered: Oct 31, 2001 |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 563 |
| | Posted: | | | | I could see a lot of ping-ponging on this one. Personally, I lean towards Super Duper $@%!#& Cut
I could also see a case for not including it at all. The purpose of the Edition field is to distinguish between various versions. AFAIK, this version is the only version available (outside of retailer exclusives, which all include this version). There is no theatrical-only version of the BD. | | | | My phpDVDprofiler collection |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,282 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would include ALL the text. So "Super Duper $@%!#& Cut". |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting GreyHulk: Quote:
I would include ALL the text. So "Super Duper $@%!#& Cut". As would I | | | | Pete |
|