|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
Sound Mixer Question |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: July 16, 2010 | Reputation: | Posts: 527 |
| Posted: | | | | Dear All Where do sound credits start and end? This is important in terms of the Sound Mixer credit, which appears to rely on a determination of this to inform how to correctly submit this role to the database. Here’s a nice example: How should Sound Mixer Petur Hliddal be audited? He’s the first sound credit given in the end credits, so is he inside or outside the sound credits in this case? Should he be contributed as: Production Sound Mixer (as he’s listed outside the sound credits) Sound Re-recording Mixer (as he’s not listed outside the sound credits) Nothing (as he’s not listed outside the sound credits but the Rules say “Sound Mixing” not “Sound Mixer” in the Credited As column for the ”Sound Re-recording Mixer”) Something Else As well as this affecting him, it also affects two sound recordist credits, which get included or excluded, depending on how this Sound Mixer credit is treated. There are no other sound mixer credits for this film but there are two sound re-recording mixer ones in a later part of the end credits. A bit of a look through the database indicates that Petur Hliddal is almost always submitted as a Production Sound Mixer. This is taken from Edward Scissorhands 5039036003865. At present he’s in the database as Production Sound Mixer, which suggests the first option above. I won’t actually be contributing this particular audit as my copy of this DVD is a re-release, with a totally different cover and lots of changes to some of the other details, but this is a question I’ve asked myself before and this is a good example. In my mind, the question hinges on whether the first sound credit in a list of sound credits can be considered as inside the sound credits, and (in this case) are the boom man and the cablemen part of the sound credits? Thanks. Paul | | | Do you ever find yourself striving for perfection with an almost worthless attempt at it? Guttermouth "Lemon Water". Also, I include in my Profiler database VHS tapes, audio DVDs, audio books (digital, cassette and CD), video games (digital, DVD and CD) and 'enhanced' CDs with video tracks on them, as well as films and TV I've bought digitally. So I'm an anarchist, deal with it. Just be thankful I don't include most of my records and CDs etc in it too; don't think I haven't been tempted... |
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Credit right next to the Boom Man, that makes him a Production Sound Mixer. The other credits are music credits anyway, not sound credits. (Music is sound, but sound is not music).
Edit: also ignore Mixer/Mixing or plurals. I have even had the audacity to equate Audio with Sound, and was never challenged on that. | | | Hans | | | Last edited: by Staid S Barr |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | The nearest thing i find to a constant among the consistently variable crew credits is that the Production Sound Mixer credit is followed by the Boom Man.
So this Sound Mixer credit is a Production Sound Mixer.
Besides which there are already a couple of Sound Re-recording Mixers (Maslow/Kastner) listed later in the credits. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! | | | Last edited: by tweeter |
| Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | he would be a prod. snd mixer. The prod. snd mixer is in charge of hiring the boom op. and any sound techs(Cable men). That is why they are usually listed after the mixer and outside the sound credits. | | | Last edited: by ateo357 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting tweeter: Quote: The nearest thing i find to a constant among the consistently variable crew credits is that the Production Sound Mixer credit is followed by the Boom Man.
So this Sound Mixer credit is a Production Sound Mixer.
Besides which there are already a couple of Sound Re-recording Mixers (Maslow/Kastner) listed later in the credits. This has been my experience as well. If the credit is followed by the Boom Man, then it is PSM. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: July 16, 2010 | Reputation: | Posts: 527 |
| Posted: | | | | Hello
Thanks for that. Just to be clear then, in this case the Sound Mixer credit is outside the sound credits (as written in the Rule for sound mixers), so is to be considered a Production Sound Mixer one?
So the Boom Man and Cablemen aren’t sound credits? I know we don’t contribute these, but they do, em, sound a lot like sound credits, especially as they’re surrounded by sound credits.
This suggests that when the Rules ask whether the Sound Mixer credit is outside the sound credits or not, they don't want us to consider any roles that aren’t contributed; if we did consider the latter then I don't see how the Sound Mixer credit in this case can be considered to be outside the sound credits, which means it wouldn't quality as the Production Sound Manager.
I’m not trying to argue that the sound mixer in this case isn’t the Production Sound Mixer, (there’s loads of evidence to suggest this is the real world situation), but I am trying to make sense of the Rule so as to apply it correctly in other cases.
Paul | | | Do you ever find yourself striving for perfection with an almost worthless attempt at it? Guttermouth "Lemon Water". Also, I include in my Profiler database VHS tapes, audio DVDs, audio books (digital, cassette and CD), video games (digital, DVD and CD) and 'enhanced' CDs with video tracks on them, as well as films and TV I've bought digitally. So I'm an anarchist, deal with it. Just be thankful I don't include most of my records and CDs etc in it too; don't think I haven't been tempted... | | | Last edited: by SpikyCactus |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | In many (most?) cases the Production sound credits (PSM, Boom, etc.) are not adjacent to the Post-production (Editors, Re-recording Mixers, etc.) sound credits. In the example you selected they do happen to be adjacent.
That proximity doesn't automatically mean a Sound Mixer is not the PSM. In the context of all the sound credits it is obvious to me in this case (because others were explicitly credited as Re-recording Mixers) that the Sound Mixer is the PSM.
I've run across Sound Mixing credits where i couldn't tell if it was a PSM or Re-recording Mixer and the distance between credits didn't help decide things (i find it rarely is useful). If i don't know which is right i don't submit the credit. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! | | | Last edited: by tweeter |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Applause all around, well done | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|