| Author |
Message |
| Registered: May 11, 2007 |  Posts: 249 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'm sure I saw a topic in the forum like this recently, but am unable to find it.
In The Ninth Gate there is a credit for Bernard & Marinette Richier as Cafe Owners.
How should I enter this in the profile?
I thought about this:
Cafe Owners (group divider)
Bernard Richier [Bernard & Marinette Richier]
Marinette Richier [Bernard & Marinette Richier]
But maybe there are other / better ideas... |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,749 |
| | Posted: | | | | That's the way I do it and it's always been accepted. | | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
| Registered: October 6, 2008 | | Posts: 1,932 |
| | Posted: | | | | That way is fine, I wouldn't vote against it.
But I think the Credited As part is not needed. The surname is distributable to the two given names. If I speak of "my cat and dog" it is clearly understood that I am referring to both "my cat" and "my dog." Names work the same way. Writing "Bernard & Marinette Richier" is just a shortcut for "Bernard Richier" and "Marinette Richier." |
|
| Registered: April 17, 2007 |  Posts: 771 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CalebAndCo: Quote:
That way is fine, I wouldn't vote against it.
But I think the Credited As part is not needed. The surname is distributable to the two given names. If I speak of "my cat and dog" it is clearly understood that I am referring to both "my cat" and "my dog." Names work the same way. Writing "Bernard & Marinette Richier" is just a shortcut for "Bernard Richier" and "Marinette Richier." +1 | | |  |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,998 |
| |
| Registered: May 11, 2007 | | Posts: 249 |
| |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,749 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks gang. Since there is no rule covering it but it seems to be the general consensus, I will stop contributing listings with that kind of credit and keep them local. | | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,656 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting CalebAndCo: Quote:
That way is fine, I wouldn't vote against it.
But I think the Credited As part is not needed. The surname is distributable to the two given names. If I speak of "my cat and dog" it is clearly understood that I am referring to both "my cat" and "my dog." Names work the same way. Writing "Bernard & Marinette Richier" is just a shortcut for "Bernard Richier" and "Marinette Richier." This. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | I certainly wouldn't vote no to leaving off the "credited as" but I have to admit I think it's nice to see the exact wording from the screen. Leaving off the "credited as" means we don't get to see that they were credited as a couple - an extremely minor thing, but that's why I use it. |
|
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,665 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
I certainly wouldn't vote no to leaving off the "credited as" but I have to admit I think it's nice to see the exact wording from the screen. Leaving off the "credited as" means we don't get to see that they were credited as a couple - an extremely minor thing, but that's why I use it. Indeed, if the Credited As is used you get to see the proper credit twice. Double the pleasure, double the fun!  | | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
I certainly wouldn't vote no to leaving off the "credited as" but I have to admit I think it's nice to see the exact wording from the screen. Leaving off the "credited as" means we don't get to see that they were credited as a couple - an extremely minor thing, but that's why I use it. +1 | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
I certainly wouldn't vote no to leaving off the "credited as" but I have to admit I think it's nice to see the exact wording from the screen. Leaving off the "credited as" means we don't get to see that they were credited as a couple - an extremely minor thing, but that's why I use it. Sounds reasonable to me. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|