Quote:
The Silence of the Lambs --> Douglas L. Murray Re-recordist (I think invalid because there is a Re-recording mixer listed before)
Malcolm X --> Douglas L. Murray Re-recordist (also here there is a Re-recording mixer listed before)
Philadelphia --> Doug Murray Re-recordist (same situation)

Quote:
Quoting Corne:

Quote:
By the current rules those are valid entries (Sound Re-recordist is in the 'Sound Re-recording Mixer' role chart). Only a sound credit is invalid if a production sound mixer is credited.

There were people who argued the same thing before the "Sound" clarification. That misconception caused a lot of bad data to get into the database, which all had to be cleaned up again later on. Let's not make the same mistake here again: this is exactly the same principle. The re-recording mixer is who we're after, and if there's an additional re-recordist credited, then that's only a minor studio technician assisting the guy we're actually after. Again, you can argue that it's technically allowed, and keep contributing these people, but it's merely an oversight that the rules don't address this yet. At some point, what I've just explained will be confirmed, and any such credits will have to be removed again.

Quote:

Unfortunately we have to go by the current rules. Do you have some statement/announcement from Ken or Gerri that this rule will change?

Quote:
FYI in three episodes of the first season of Sex of the City he's credited as Re-Recording Mixer and are definitely valid.

Quote:

Sound Re-recordist or just Re-recordist is the same. You would credit a Film Editor too when he's credited as just Editor (except when it's a a story editor). T!M has definitely a point and I hope that this matter has been addressed by Ken or Gerri?