Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 ...7  Previous   Next
When is a name right, if it's wrong?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantPoochJD
Registered: July 13, 2008
Posts: 58
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Hi,

Ok, now even though I'm a newbie here, and I've already seen several threads about the pro's and con's of using IMDB for cast/crew data, and the accuracy thereof, but I am left wondering:

"When is a name right, if it's wrong"?

I can name several occasions when a film (that is, the name appearing on screen on the actual movie itself, rather than the case, articles, or online/print materials) where a name is clearly a misprint/error, yet if we follow the rules set out by DVD Profiler, Ken Cole, et al, then there rules would dictate that the wrong name, would be right - which clearly goes against all that is appropriate and correct, in trying to create a DVD database that is as accurate as can possibly be.

For example:

In the Pilot Movie/Feature-length Pilot Episode for the TV series CRIME STORY, as created by Michael Mann and directed by Abel Ferrara, there is a character in it called Johnny O'Donnell, played by ex-"NYPD Blue" actor David Caruso.

Now, in the episode, the end-credits incorrectly spell the character's name as "Johnny O'Donnel" (note the missing "L" at the end of the surname). In the episode itself, the son works for his parents at a Mom-&-Pop store called "O'Donnell's".

IMDB lists the character as "O'Donnel" (with one "L"), but even director Michael Mann, and the cast admit that this spelling is incorrect in the episode's credits, and that it should read "O'Donnell" (with two "L's").

So, which one is right?
- The incorrectly listed "O'Donnel", as shown in the credits, but which Mann admits himself is wrong, or
- The correct "O'Donnell", which is what it should be, and was clearly meant to be?

Now, I know that this is going to cause a huge fuss, but surely we should have a simple rule, that goes something along the lines of:

1) If a cast or crew name, real or fictional, is knowingly incorrect, then it's changed to the one it should be, rather than the one it may be being listed as .

2) If a cast or crew name contains accents, missing or accidentally included, then we ignore or remove them in full, as most modern computers in the world simply can't deal with them in an easy fashion. Ignoring them, also means you don't have to worry if Gerard Depardieu includes or excludes the accent over the "e" in his first name.

3) For all foreign-names, real or fictional, where the surname is shown/listed in front of the forename, then the full name is reverted to the format that the cast member's own country uses. Hence Japanese animator may be known to Western audiences as Hayao Miyazaki, as Miyazaki is the surname, and Japanese people place the surname/family name before the firstname, then he should always be listed as Miyazaki Hayao.

4) And, any name of a real person, should always revert to:
- primarily, their birth name, unless
- secondarily, their most-popular or most well-known and frequently used combination actor name should be used, (e.g. Charlton Heston, which is not his birth name, nor real name), OR UNLESS
- thirdly, their most well-known and frequently used name they wish to be known by is their more commonly known and accepted use! Thus, someone like Chow Yun-Fat would be known by his most comonly known name of "Chow Yun-Fat", even though that is not his real birth name, nor the name he may be known by in some Eastern countries.

What do you all think? Surely common sense rules should be applied, rather than any other form of ruling decisions, no matter how well-meaning or "accurate" they may be?


Pooch
 Last edited: by PoochJD
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorTomGaines
Registered Sept. 24, 2001
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Germany Posts: 2,005
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
If a name is credited incorrectly then you have to list it as such in Profiler, though you can make use of the common name/credited as function. Nowhere it is said, that you have to set the common name to the incorrectly listed credit. Though you should look up the mostly used variation through the credit look up first.


DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorcvermeylen
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Belgium Posts: 1,946
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
Since in this case the error was made in the role, and not the actor's name, the common name won't help.

If it bothers you this much, you can change it locally, and lock your cast. For the online database, it has to be what's in the credits, including the spelling error.
View my collection at http://www.chriskepolis.be/home/dvd.htm

Chris
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting PoochJD:
Quote:
Hi,

Ok, now even though I'm a newbie here, and I've already seen several threads about the pro's and con's of using IMDB for cast/crew data, and the accuracy thereof, but I am left wondering:

"When is a name right, if it's wrong"?

I can name several occasions when a film (that is, the name appearing on screen on the actual movie itself, rather than the case, articles, or online/print materials) where a name is clearly a misprint/error, yet if we follow the rules set out by DVD Profiler, Ken Cole, et al, then there rules would dictate that the wrong name, would be right - which clearly goes against all that is appropriate and correct, in trying to create a DVD database that is as accurate as can possibly be.

For example:

In the Pilot Movie/Feature-length Pilot Episode for the TV series CRIME STORY, as created by Michael Mann and directed by Abel Ferrara, there is a character in it called Johnny O'Donnell, played by ex-"NYPD Blue" actor David Caruso.

Now, in the episode, the end-credits incorrectly spell the character's name as "Johnny O'Donnel" (note the missing "L" at the end of the surname). In the episode itself, the son works for his parents at a Mom-&-Pop store called "O'Donnell's".

IMDB lists the character as "O'Donnel" (with one "L"), but even director Michael Mann, and the cast admit that this spelling is incorrect in the episode's credits, and that it should read "O'Donnell" (with two "L's").

So, which one is right?
- The incorrectly listed "O'Donnel", as shown in the credits, but which Mann admits himself is wrong, or
- The correct "O'Donnell", which is what it should be, and was clearly meant to be?

Now, I know that this is going to cause a huge fuss, but surely we should have a simple rule, that goes something along the lines of:

1) If a cast or crew name, real or fictional, is knowingly incorrect, then it's changed to the one it should be, rather than the one it may be being listed as .


When it comes to the name of the character the rules tells us exactly what to use. We go strictly by the credits... exactly as it is credited.

Rules Quote:
Quote:
For any film with standard credits, take the actor information from the end credits only, with names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited.


See the part I put in bold. A plan and simple rule for everyone to follow as it should be.

Quote:

2) If a cast or crew name contains accents, missing or accidentally included, then we ignore or remove them in full, as most modern computers in the world simply can't deal with them in an easy fashion. Ignoring them, also means you don't have to worry if Gerard Depardieu includes or excludes the accent over the "e" in his first name.

3) For all foreign-names, real or fictional, where the surname is shown/listed in front of the forename, then the full name is reverted to the format that the cast member's own country uses. Hence Japanese animator may be known to Western audiences as Hayao Miyazaki, as Miyazaki is the surname, and Japanese people place the surname/family name before the firstname, then he should always be listed as Miyazaki Hayao.

4) And, any name of a real person, should always revert to:
- primarily, their birth name, unless
- secondarily, their most-popular or most well-known and frequently used combination actor name should be used, (e.g. Charlton Heston, which is not his birth name, nor real name), OR UNLESS
- thirdly, their most well-known and frequently used name they wish to be known by is their more commonly known and accepted use! Thus, someone like Chow Yun-Fat would be known by his most comonly known name of "Chow Yun-Fat", even though that is not his real birth name, nor the name he may be known by in some Eastern countries.

What do you all think? Surely common sense rules should be applied, rather than any other form of ruling decisions, no matter how well-meaning or "accurate" they may be?


Pooch


For the rest... I definitely believe we need a more of a strict set of rules to tell us exactly how to input everything. What is common sense to you on these matters may not be the same thing as what would be common sense to me... what may not be the same thing that is common sense to the next person... and so on.

We had a time before the rules that are posted where everyone did what they believed was "right"... and it lead us no where fast. Then the rules came and cleaned up quite a bit of the mess. Sure the rules are not perfect. But they are what we have to work with. And Ken Cole does update the rules. Not as often as I would like... but it does get done some at a time.

To try to help get things changed in the rules we have the Rules Committee Forum... which anyone can join by sending a request.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,678
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
This rule leads to some strange results sometimes.

In Jess Franco's "Eugenie...The Story Of Her Journey Into Perversion", Marie Liljedahl plays Eugenie, but in the credits the role is misspelled "Eugene". So according to Profiler she's playing a man... 
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
This rule leads to some strange results sometimes.

In Jess Franco's "Eugenie...The Story Of Her Journey Into Perversion", Marie Liljedahl plays Eugenie, but in the credits the role is misspelled "Eugene". So according to Profiler she's playing a man... 


Not according to Profiler, according to the credits which is what we track. I don't really see anything strange about that, it's just the way we do things.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
This rule leads to some strange results sometimes.

In Jess Franco's "Eugenie...The Story Of Her Journey Into Perversion", Marie Liljedahl plays Eugenie, but in the credits the role is misspelled "Eugene". So according to Profiler she's playing a man... 


Not according to Profiler, according to the credits which is what we track. I don't really see anything strange about that, it's just the way we do things.

Agree
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,678
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
This rule leads to some strange results sometimes.

In Jess Franco's "Eugenie...The Story Of Her Journey Into Perversion", Marie Liljedahl plays Eugenie, but in the credits the role is misspelled "Eugene". So according to Profiler she's playing a man... 


Not according to Profiler, according to the credits which is what we track. I don't really see anything strange about that, it's just the way we do things.

Well, personally I would rather track the actual role rather than tracking the credits. But that's just me, I guess. 
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantCalebAndCo
Ralphie shot first.
Registered: October 6, 2008
United States Posts: 1,932
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
This rule leads to some strange results sometimes.

In Jess Franco's "Eugenie...The Story Of Her Journey Into Perversion", Marie Liljedahl plays Eugenie, but in the credits the role is misspelled "Eugene". So according to Profiler she's playing a man... 


Not according to Profiler, according to the credits which is what we track. I don't really see anything strange about that, it's just the way we do things.

Well, personally I would rather track the actual role rather than tracking the credits. But that's just me, I guess. 

You can do anything you like in your local, of course.  What I have done locally, once or twice in cases like this, is add an uncredited listing for the actor with the correctly spelled role and maybe an asterisk (*) to call attention to it.  That preserves the credited role as is and provides the correct role for reference.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:

Well, personally I would rather track the actual role rather than tracking the credits. But that's just me, I guess. 


And on one is stopping you of course.

For the online this is one of the simplest rules to follow. I wish the crew credits were as simple, then we would have no problems with them! Once you start changing credits you're on a slippery slope. What's next then, maybe more elaborate roles like IMDb (that sometimes even contain plot spoilers).
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,678
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Seems simple enough to me. If there is a documentable error in the role name we should be able to enter the correct name.

If the running time listed on the cover is incorrect, we use the actual running time. So it's not like we never correct documentable errors.

The difference is, of course, that the credits are part of the actual film. But why would we prefer to track the (incorrect) credits instead of tracking the actual role name? That doesn't make any sense to me.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I personally want in profiler what the actual credits say. I prefer it to match... plus it takes away any possible problems with people trying to ping-pong it. I personally would hate to see such a change.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCorne
Registered: Nov. 1, 2000
Registered: April 5, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,059
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
I personally want in profiler what the actual credits say. I prefer it to match... plus it takes away any possible problems with people trying to ping-pong it. I personally would hate to see such a change.


I agree!
Cor
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
The difference is, of course, that the credits are part of the actual film. But why would we prefer to track the (incorrect) credits instead of tracking the actual role name? That doesn't make any sense to me.


Because, as you say, it's a part of the film. An incorrect runtime on the other hand is just from the cover, and our primary source is the disc itself. If we start changing roles, what's stopping us from correcting actor's names, they can also be documented? I prefer not to invent data, it's just asking for more problems.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsurfeur51
Since July 3, 2003
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
France Posts: 4,479
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
But that's just me, I guess. 


No, not just you    I'm even amazed by some users' opinion on the subject, but that's just me...
Images from movies
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,678
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting KinoNiki:
Quote:
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
The difference is, of course, that the credits are part of the actual film. But why would we prefer to track the (incorrect) credits instead of tracking the actual role name? That doesn't make any sense to me.


Because, as you say, it's a part of the film. An incorrect runtime on the other hand is just from the cover, and our primary source is the disc itself. If we start changing roles, what's stopping us from correcting actor's names, they can also be documented? I prefer not to invent data, it's just asking for more problems.

It's not a matter of inventing data if the error is documentable. For example, if the movie is called "Eugenie" and the person is called Eugenie all through the movie, why would you want to list it as Eugene just because of a misspelling in the credits?

If any data can be labeled invented, it's the role name in the credits.

I find it strange that people think that the credits are more important than the actual movie... 
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 ...7  Previous   Next