Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Developed for Television by...
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorThe Movieman
DVDP User Since 2007
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,550
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I think I know the answer to this, but I wanted to be sure: does the "Developed for Television by" credit fall under anything for writing? I'm working on Smallville and was just wondering. I believe the answer would be no, but just in case I missed a discussion or something along these lines.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I've never seen any discussion for this credit either. I suppose in a way, this is equal to the "created by" credit - tv series based on original works gets "created by", tv series based on non-original works get "developed by".
Unfortunately unless the program and/or rules are changed to include this category I don't think we can include it. I don't think it fits well enough into the OMB category for it to go there. It's similar to the "adapted by" or "dialogue by" credits - there's just not a current category that it fits well enough into.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
There shouldn't be any discussion about it in 5the here and now. Bottom line it'snot credit we currently deal with. Now about the future, I am open, just not now.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorThe Movieman
DVDP User Since 2007
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,550
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:
There shouldn't be any discussion about it in 5the here and now. Bottom line it'snot credit we currently deal with. Now about the future, I am open, just not now.


Like I said, I thought I would ask. I think I will add it locally, however.
 Last edited: by The Movieman
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorVirusPil
uncredited
Registered: January 1, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 3,087
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I also think it is no credit we track right now.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorm.cellophane
tonight's the night...
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 3,480
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Here's what the Writers Guild has to say about this credit:
Quote:
3. "Developed by" Credit Determination.

Under the MBA, no specific rights attach to the "Developed by" credit. The writer who receives "Developed by" credit does not share in the Separated Rights. Consequently, it is incumbent upon the writer not only to negotiate to be proposed for the "Developed by" credit, but also to negotiate for any royalty or other available right which the parties agree will flow from the credit.

In the case of an original episodic series, a writer who has performed writing services on the program may be eligible for "Developed by" credit under the following circumstances:

    a. The writer is eligible for, but does not receive "Created by" credit on the series; or

    b. The writer receives "Teleplay by" credit on the pilot (but not "Story by" or "Written by" credit); or

    c. The writer has otherwise contributed to the "distinctiveness and viability" of the series.

The Company must agree to propose the writer for "Developed by" credit; neither a writer nor the WGA may independently request the credit if the Company does not propose it. Consequently, it is up to the writer to negotiate with the Company to be proposed for "Developed by" credit in the event the writer does not receive "Created by" credit.

Once the Company has agreed to propose a writer for "Developed by" credit on an original episodic series, it is subject to the automatic arbitration provisions of the MBA.20 Only the writer(s) entitled to "Created by" credit and the writer(s) proposed for "Developed by" credit participate in the "Developed by" arbitration.

The rules for determination of the "Developed by" credit are set forth in the Separation of Rights Manual. Three independent arbiters are asked to review and compare the relevant literary material to determine whether the writer proposed for "Developed by" credit has "contributed significantly to the series' distinctiveness and viability, [though] not enough to warrant a 'Created by' credit." The "Developed by" credit should only be granted "when the use of a 'Created by' credit alone would substantially misrepresent the writer(s) responsible for the series' distinctiveness or viability."
...James

"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Again with the WG. Fact at this time we do NOT have Developed By as an acceptable role, very simple. The closest would be created by, but Developed By is completely different. If Ken wants to add it, fine, I am all for it. But right now the answer is no because it is NOT, I repeat, James, NOT listed as an acceptable credit. Very simple and very easy to understand.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorm.cellophane
tonight's the night...
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 3,480
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I did not express an opinion on whether it should be included or not. The Writers Guild determines this credit and therefore it's important to understand the requirements for the credit.
...James

"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
No, it's not, James. Only one thing is required. Do we or do we NOT include Developed By. The answer to that question is simply not at this time. There is no other answer and the WG is completely irrelevant. IF Ken decides to add Developed By, primarily a Television credit, then we can list it and the WG has nothing to do with it. I don't see that including anything about this from them brings anything to the table at all, UNLESS perhaps Ken wants it for some reason.

Were I ken,I would simply decide to addit or not and the WG would be irrelevant, and by the way I would add it. Not based on the WG nor anything else, I see it is as a cousin of Created By and an important piece of data for us to capture. That simple, land that wasreached without any outside definitions by anyone, simple an evaluation of what i believe to be the value of the data and how best to attribute it in profiler, and that would be to add a developed by Role and not asa subset of Created By or any other role. it's a very simple process to me, James.<shrugs> and confused at what point you think you are trying to make.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:
No, it's not, James. Only one thing is required. Do we or do we NOT include Developed By. The answer to that question is simply not at this time. There is no other answer and the WG is completely irrelevant. IF Ken decides to add Developed By, primarily a Television credit, then we can list it and the WG has nothing to do with it. I don't see that including anything about this from them brings anything to the table at all, UNLESS perhaps Ken wants it for some reason.

Please stop doing this.  While it may not mean anything to you, I always enjoy these posts by James as, quite often, I learn something I didn't know.  I was going to look it up myself, to see it it may be a television equivalent to one of our film credits, but James saved me the time.
Quote:
Were I ken,I would simply decide to addit or not and the WG would be irrelevant, and by the way I would add it. Not based on the WG nor anything else, I see it is as a cousin of Created By and an important piece of data for us to capture. That simple, land that wasreached without any outside definitions by anyone, simple an evaluation of what i believe to be the value of the data and how best to attribute it in profiler, and that would be to add a developed by Role and not asa subset of Created By or any other role. it's a very simple process to me, James.<shrugs> and confused at what point you think you are trying to make.

I honestly don't see what is so confusing.  James offered information, on the credit, for those that may not have known.  While it may not be important to you, it may be important to other users.  Beyond that, knowledge is never a bad thing, so I thank James for providing that knowledge and hope he continues to do so.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Your comments are inflammatory, argumentative and completely unnecessary. I am thrilled that you find James' side postings so informative. I did not address YOU. As I said i take a much more pragmatic view than you do. I don't need the WG or anyone else to evaluate what the value of the data is.Dop I consider, gaffers to be a valuable addition to profiler...no,I don't,  and no amount of infomation provided from whatever source is likely to persuade me to the contrary.

The answer to this is very simple, and right NOW the answer is that we do NOT include Developed By. James provided information, to what end, i am not sure it doesn't change anything TODAY and it is not really needed to make a call in the future, I would add it and that is without the information James provided. And THAT is precisely what i said and YOU choose to attack me for NO reason. Now we can't add it,maybe and hopefully tomorrow (some Monday) we can.You are picking a fight where there is none. James posted a piece from WG to what end, it doesn't change anything, it does not change the FACT that we cannot currently use it, nor does it change in any way my opinion that we should be able to, but that is not an issue for today, that is an issue for ken to decide tomorrow or some Monday.

Get off your high horse and drop the , oh he dared to say something about something to somebody i ahve to get him, i have to shut him up attitude.

As I said Martian, this answer is easy per the rules NOW, so the question becomes one for the future. In which case I am trying to figure out james' motive for bringing WG to the table.  Was he trying to create a future argument, which is not one of WG or anyone else's definition it is merely a judgement of the value of the data and I have explained my view of that. OR was he trying to create a present argument to further undermine and water down the rules  by shoehorning yet another piece of data that is not covered by the current Rules. Or was he just throwing it out there, which is just a little odd. You don't even make any attempt at that you just blather on about how much you appreciate  the "knowledge"...to what end present or future, i don't know what you are talking but you feel it is OK top attack me, and you clearly did not understand what i was saying, because if you had there would be no need for your nasty post.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
James,

I too enjoy the things you post. You always go out of your way and put extra effort into your posts. I find them quite fascinating and informative and hope you continue to post these types of things. Thank you.
 Last edited: by Kathy
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:
Your comments are inflammatory, argumentative and completely unnecessary.


So are yours. Please refrain from this type of rhetoric.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorJimmy S
Registered: March 15, 2007
Canada Posts: 1,982
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Why do you bother changing your name a millions time since you always keep the same confrontational attitude Skip? Do you try to be ban for good? Try to learn a little...

Thanks for the info James
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
No Name:

The reasons i change my name are fairly obvious for those who know who Jubal, is or professor kingsfield or even Winston Smith. Perhaps, just perhaps you should get a sense of humor. You as well Kathy. No Name is not YOUR screen name originally, why did you change it, I am not trying to hide, I am making fun of myself and everybody, are you trying to hide. I think I know who you are, but that's for me.       And you are right if you are who o think you are, Noname Needed is appropriate...absolutely, but then I DO have a sense of humor and I do not believe in 1984, likemany do here.

Kathy I have one thing for you based upon your attitude...MYOB. And i'll thank you for it.

I have nothing else to say on this and i have no dubt that will be more hostileand nasty remarks,I can predict where they wil come from and what they contain and i will simply throw reds arrows at  everyone of them.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorJimmy S
Registered: March 15, 2007
Canada Posts: 1,982
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
It isn't hard to know who I am Skip, I use my real name on my blog who is linked in my signature. But if you don't want to check I was AESP_pres before, I change my alias after the last "adult" argument I had here.

You know perfectly well that we have a good relation in the past and agreed on many things. My post wasn't an attack or anything, just an advice as a past friend.
 Last edited: by Jimmy S
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next