Author |
Message |
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Title says it all. Discuss. |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | I've never heard of a "text commentary" before, but I would say that for it to be a commentary, there has to be an identified (and probably singular) source - you have to be told who is giving you this info. Whereas a trivia track can be anonymous. |
|
Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 357 |
| Posted: | | | | For me a text commentary is a subtitle like overlay. A trivia track should be audio but it's not how it appears on the disks; the QT disks and many others have trivia tracks that are text based. I suppose we revert back to first principals and go with what the disk menu/case calls it or what most closely fits a dictionary definition. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | The titles in question are the Star Trek DVD's which list "Text Commentary" on the cover/discs by the author(s) of the Star Trek Encyclopedia, but are being changed to "Trivia".
I'm leaning towards voting No, but for now am just Neutral on those. | | | Corey |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Most text commentaries I have seen are just a subtitles to an existing audio commentary. Trivia tracks that I have seen are subtitles that are usually film factoids or some other short textural pieces of information. Don't think I have seen a DVD or Blu-ray using a audio trivia track but, there is always a first. Quoting Katatonia: Quote: The titles in question are the Star Trek DVD's which list "Text Commentary" on the cover/discs by the author(s) of the Star Trek Encyclopedia, but are being changed to "Trivia".
I'm leaning towards voting No, but for now am just Neutral on those. These discs always bugged, they are contributed with Text Commentary in Other Features. But, the rules say use the Commentary check box for either Audio or Text Commentary. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. | | | Last edited: by Tracer |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Katatonia: Quote: The titles in question are the Star Trek DVD's which list "Text Commentary" on the cover/discs by the author(s) of the Star Trek Encyclopedia, but are being changed to "Trivia".
I'm leaning towards voting No, but for now am just Neutral on those. I would vote "no" on this. If it's labelled as a "text commentary" on the cover or in the menus, then we tick the commentary box. It's not listed as Trivia on the cover, so why list it as Trivia in the profile? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: I would vote "no" on this. If it's labelled as a "text commentary" on the cover or in the menus, then we tick the commentary box. It's not listed as Trivia on the cover, so why list it as Trivia in the profile? Yes, the more I think of that, I have to fully agree and have changed my votes to "No" in the contributions in question. | | | Corey |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: I would vote "no" on this. If it's labelled as a "text commentary" on the cover or in the menus, then we tick the commentary box. It's not listed as Trivia on the cover, so why list it as Trivia in the profile? The reason would be if the content didn't match the cover or menus. Same would be if a Menu labeled Deleted Scenes as Out takes we wouldn't check it as Bloopers just because the menu label was different than the actual content. Same goes if the cover list an audio track 5.1 yet the audio track is actually something else. The actual content should over ride menus and covers. In the case of these movies I haven't watched the Text Commentary track to see if it really is a Trivia track. So can't say in this case but, if it really is a Trivia subtitle that should out weigh the menu or cover. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. | | | Last edited: by Tracer |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote: In the case of these movies I haven't watched the Text Commentary track to see if it really is a Trivia track. So can't say in this case but, if it really is a Trivia subtitle that should out weigh the menu or cover. The thing is, is that it's a "Text Commentary" by two people on a couple of the Star Trek movies, and they are listed as authors of a published encyclopedia. The text commentary plays as if it was definitely scripted of course (as some audio commentaries do), but I could often imagine a person vocalizing it on an actual audio commentary. | | | Corey | | | Last edited: by Katatonia |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree that what's on the disc should override what's on the cover, but in this case, when there's such little difference between text commentary and text trivia, I would follow the cover unless there was something on the disc that clearly said "trivia track" (or similar). |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | I've always thought commentaries are by some identifiable person or people whereas trivia is just presented as a list of facts not representing any particular person's view.
Another possible standard would be to call it whatever the DVD calls it.
Or we could always use trivia for this sort of thing and use commentary only for subtitles of an audio commentary. |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: I've always thought commentaries are by some identifiable person or people whereas trivia is just presented as a list of facts not representing any particular person's view.
Another possible standard would be to call it whatever the DVD calls it.
Or we could always use trivia for this sort of thing and use commentary only for subtitles of an audio commentary. In this case I believe the people are identified as the authors of the Star Trek Encyclopaedia, so that strengthens the case for commentary. Also we couldn't use commentary only for subtitles of an audio commentary as the rules specifically say to use the commentary check-box for text commentaries. |
|
Registered: December 22, 2008 | Posts: 87 |
| Posted: | | | | Uuuuh... I see where this comes from, I voted No to the first submission to this changes, but it doesn't seem to be a problem of the outdated comparsion screen – the screen shows "Audio Commentaries" instead of "Commentaries" (only) as IMO any kind of textual commentaries are included per definition in the Contribution Rules.
Til today, it seemed pretty clear to me: a Trivia (subtitle) track is a Text Commentary, so you check the "Commentaries" box in the Features section and the "Trivia" box in the Subtitles section. If it's an Audio Commentary you check the same box in the Features section and enter it into the Audio section, and if the same Audio Commentary is subtitled, then you check additionally the "Commentary" box in the Subtitles section.
The reason for a "Trivia" entry in the Subtitles section is obviously to keep the subtitles for an audio commentary apart from the text commentary subtitles (same as Fun Facts, an other pop-up text tidbits) – not to judge the content and quality of the "commentary". But of course you need to ask Ken what the intention of the "Trivia" entry is, because unfortunatly it isn't specified in the Contribution Rules. |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting M_E: Quote: The reason for a "Trivia" entry in the Subtitles section is obviously to keep the subtitles for an audio commentary apart from the text commentary subtitles (same as Fun Facts, an other pop-up text tidbits) – not to judge the content and quality of the "commentary". But of course you need to ask Ken what the intention of the "Trivia" entry is, because unfortunatly it isn't specified in the Contribution Rules. You know, I didn't even know that was there. When they were talking about making it a trivia track, I assumed they meant it was getting moved to "other features". |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting M_E: Quote: Uuuuh... I see where this comes from, I voted No to the first submission to this changes, but it doesn't seem to be a problem of the outdated comparsion screen – the screen shows "Audio Commentaries" instead of "Commentaries" (only) as IMO any kind of textual commentaries are included per definition in the Contribution Rules.
Til today, it seemed pretty clear to me: a Trivia (subtitle) track is a Text Commentary, so you check the "Commentaries" box in the Features section and the "Trivia" box in the Subtitles section. If it's an Audio Commentary you check the same box in the Features section and enter it into the Audio section, and if the same Audio Commentary is subtitled, then you check additionally the "Commentary" box in the Subtitles section.
The reason for a "Trivia" entry in the Subtitles section is obviously to keep the subtitles for an audio commentary apart from the text commentary subtitles (same as Fun Facts, an other pop-up text tidbits) – not to judge the content and quality of the "commentary". But of course you need to ask Ken what the intention of the "Trivia" entry is, because unfortunatly it isn't specified in the Contribution Rules. That actually makes a lot more sense than anything I've heard up to this point. I'm more inclined to vote Yes now...but it still seems like a fine line and easily confused. | | | Corey |
|
Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote:
The reason would be if the content didn't match the cover or menus. Same would be if a Menu labeled Deleted Scenes as Out takes we wouldn't check it as Bloopers just because the menu label was different than the actual content. Same goes if the cover list an audio track 5.1 yet the audio track is actually something else. The actual content should over ride menus and covers.
In the case of these movies I haven't watched the Text Commentary track to see if it really is a Trivia track. So can't say in this case but, if it really is a Trivia subtitle that should out weigh the menu or cover. But this doesn't work for ratings, if the wrong rating is on the cover we go by it (even when right one is on disc itself). We should remove cover info from everything except scans and dvd title as too many are filled with errors, and under current rules, we have to accept some ererors but not others? It does not make sense, "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this is Chubacca..." |
|