Author |
Message |
Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | A John Doe & Jane Smith Production
Does not necessarily make John Doe and Jane Smith producers.
Am I correct or in left field?
Would the producer credit need to be listed elsewhere? |
|
Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote: A John Doe & Jane Smith Production
Does not necessarily make John Doe and Jane Smith producers.
Am I correct or in left field?
Would the producer credit need to be listed elsewhere? | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | "A John Doe Production" could be a producer credit in some cases in my opinion. But this could only be the case if there is no other producer credit in the film at all. Gerri's ruling about "Airplaine" is not comparable because there is a producer credit for "Jon Davison" in that movie which makes the "A Howard W. Koch production" a production company credit (which could be entered as such to the profile).
When there is no other producer credit it depends IMO if "John Doe" or "John Doe production" is a company or not. | | | Last edited: by RHo |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | This is not a producer credit. Gerri's ruling about 'Airplane' is comparable because it is the exact same credit format. For this to be a produce credit, it would need to read 'Producer' or 'Produced by'.
Let's not make this any more complicated than it has to be. We already have enough of those credits. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
Registered: February 10, 2008 | Posts: 244 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: This is not a producer credit. Gerri's ruling about 'Airplane' is comparable because it is the exact same credit format. For this to be a produce credit, it would need to read 'Producer' or 'Produced by'.
Let's not make this any more complicated than it has to be. We already have enough of those credits. Exactly |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: "A Howard W. Koch production" a production company credit (which could be entered as such to the profile) Since when? I only enter these if it states: "Howard W. Koch Production s" If it states "A Howard W. Koch production" that doesn't indicate to me an actual production company and I would both vote NO and remove such entries (and have on a recent update). |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: Since when? Well, I can understand where RHo is coming from - it's not unreasonable to say that it's either one or the other. It's not so strange to think: well, if "an XXX production" doesn't qualify for a "producer" credit for XXX, then XXX must be a production company. After all, the film is labelled as being "an XXX production" - I'm not surprised that someone would want to track XXX somewhere... I personally haven't done that, however, and I tend to follow your line of reasoning. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: Quoting RHo:
Quote: "A Howard W. Koch production" a production company credit (which could be entered as such to the profile) Since when?
I only enter these if it states: "Howard W. Koch Productions"
If it states "A Howard W. Koch production" that doesn't indicate to me an actual production company and I would both vote NO and remove such entries (and have on a recent update). We also enter "A View Askew production" as a company credit even though the official company name is "View Askew Productions". How is "A Howard W. Koch production" different? This is only one example. A lot of companies are named "Something Productions" or "Something Films" and the company credit is still "A Something production". | | | Last edited: by RHo |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: Quoting Pantheon:
Quote: Quoting RHo:
Quote: "A Howard W. Koch production" a production company credit (which could be entered as such to the profile) Since when?
I only enter these if it states: "Howard W. Koch Productions"
If it states "A Howard W. Koch production" that doesn't indicate to me an actual production company and I would both vote NO and remove such entries (and have on a recent update). We also enter "A View Askew production" as a company credit even though the official company name is "View Askew Productions". How is "A Howard W. Koch production" different?
This is only one example. A lot of companies are named "Something Productions" or "Something Films" and the company credit is still "A Something production". Because, I've always been led to believe that just because a person's name is mentioned it doesn't necessarily mean that there is a company by that name. Howard W. Koch may very well own a production company but it could be called something totally different so we wouldn't use this in the Prod Company field. I've been around a long time and have never seen anything to say we use these for Production Company - which is why I questioned it. If we are, in fact, meant to be using these I would simply like to know for future reference. Does anyone know where this discussion happened? |
|