|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
Production Year for The Evil Dead, 1981, 1982 or 1983? |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | Just completed an update to my copy of The Evil Dead. The one thing I didn't even pay attention to was the production year. Looking in the system, it seems there is a widespread discrepancy for the production year for the film, ranging from 1981 - 1983.
According to IMDB (I know... but it seems to be the most reliable place to find this information as no other site I've found has yet to break down the release dates as well!) October 15th 1981 - Premiere, Detroit Michigan March 31st 1982 - American Film Market April 15th 1983 - Opened wide in the U.S.? (April 22nd 1983 - Opened wide in Canada, and it's not like release dates often vary across that imaginary line when we're talking wide releases).
Anyone know which year, for sure, should be entered as the production year? Or anyone know of any other sites that break it down more completely? There's not even a fairly even split for the production year in the system. There's a bunch of profiles that each have the three separate years as their production years.
Any help would be muchly appreciated! | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Inho it would be 1982. Just the premiere was in 1981. (Not public) The first release for general viewers was in 1982. (After AFM and some festivals, it was released at 9th December 1982 in the UK, also according to imdb) | | | Last edited: by VirusPil |
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for the opinion VirusPil! Any other opinions on this one (or in other words... shameless bump as I'm entirely not sure what the Production Year actually should be? I mean, we get seven paged threads on parsing of names, I was hoping a production year debate could spark AT LEAST five pages... ). | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. | | | Last edited: by Merrik |
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | IMHO we need an official view on premieres/film festivals/etc... Some people say it has to be a (general) public release but that isn't required - Quote: Enter the year of the original theatrical release. For films that have been updated (e.g., a Special Edition or Directors Cut) use the year of the original release, not the year that the re-release was “made” or released. I can understand both sides & I think the only way we're going to get everyone on the same page is if Ken/Gerri give a once and for all as to whether or not they consider the above to be allowable or not. | | | Last edited: by Ardos |
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: IMHO we need an official view on premieres/film festivals/etc...
Some people say it has to be a (general) public release but that isn't required - Yeah, I've always, always thought of The Evil Dead as a 1981 release. From the time I really started to get into horror movies (about 16-17 years ago), until today. Yesterday when I saw the Production Year, and decided to check the rest of the dates, I was totally surprised to see such a wide variance between the three years. Of course after checking IMDB and realizing that it effectively had three different release dates (which I didn't know of until now), I see the confusion, especially with a lack of clarity in regards to that specific field. | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
| Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 357 |
| Posted: | | | | I think the problem is how do we deal with a film that never had a general release just limited screenings? Also if General relase = Theatrical release why have 2 terms for the same thing?
There are different opinions but I think theatrical release is a release in a movie theatre. That's all it needs to be considered for an Oscar (In Los Angeles County) I believe.
Also BAFTA rules say:
(A film must) receive its first public exhibition or distribution in the UK as a theatrical release
and have a seperate rule of
and
be exhibited publicly to a paying audience within a commercial cinema in the UK for no fewer than seven consecutive days. From that I take it that a theatrical release is neither paying, public or in a commercial cinema or the second rule (or part of it) would be redundant.
Best would be an Invelos ruling but it would make contribution notes harder still. | | | Last edited: by Graveworm |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Merrik: Quote: Thanks for the opinion VirusPil! ... It's just my opinion. As Forget_the_Rest wrote, we need an official view from Invelos to such cases. I also can understand both opinions. I can't find the site, but I remember, I was reading, that the premiere was just for the film makers, friends and other chosen persons. That's why I go with 1982, because in this year it was released according to imdb on festivals and cinema (public). |
| Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | I've just been made aware of something from the film itself. The copyright info at the end of the film says MCMLXXXII - For those who don't know Roman numerals it's 1982. While we don't generally use that info, I think we should at least take it into consideration here. If those who made the film gave it a date after the film festival, it's always a possibility that they changed something after showing it there. Here's a screenshot they sent, re-uploaded to my photobucket account so as to not use their bandwidth I have verified this against my copy as well just in case it changed across countries. |
| Registered: April 4, 2007 | Posts: 882 |
| Posted: | | | | Another reason why I'm using copyright years in general And why I asked for two years fields in the past (copyright & general theatrical release) along with proper rules for them. | | | - Jan |
| Registered: March 28, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,299 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS! Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles. You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. | | | Last edited: by Astrakan |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 767 |
| Posted: | | | | I had a similar discussion a few weeks ago with someone, and he mailed me the same screenshot as F_t_R just posted. Theatrical release year is not always the same as the production year. And sometimes independent films are shopped around on trademarkets and festivals for years, before being picked up for general release. This is a tough one. I've made a list of current credits of Bruce Campbell (it's safe to say he's listed in all Evil Dead profiles ). All titles are based on the original title. The Evil Dead - 1981 - 15 profiles Evil Dead - 1981 - 4 profiles The Evil Dead - 1982 - 24 profiles Evil Dead - 1982 - 3 profiles The Evil Dead - 1983 - 4 profiles The Evil Dead - The Book of the Dead - 1982 - 1 profile. This is a wrong locality, so I flagged it for deletion. Evil Dead : The Book of the Dead (original title needs to be adjusted) - 1982 - 2 profiles (1 is a wrong locality) The Evil Dead: Original 4:3 Unmatted Version - 1986 - 1 profile. This one's definitely wrong. So the score per year (at the moment) is: 1981: 19 1982: 30 1983: 4 1986: 1 |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote: http://www.bookofthedead.ws/website/the_evil_dead_production.html
Look under post production.
Quote: The movie finally opened in New York on April 15, of 1983, premièring at the Rivoli and other houses, and playing at the Wellmont in Montclair, New Jersey. Yet it also says this (bolding mine): Quote: With the film complete, a world première was organised at the 1100 seater Redford Theatre, Michigan on the 15 October 1981, and it was a big success with around 1000 in attendance. The real test was a paying audience, so they screened it at Michigan State University. The reaction was even greater, the rowdier the audience, the better. Debatable, yep, but if it played in two theaters in 1981, one of which was a paid attendance, my vote is for 1981. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | Absolutely right, Alien Redrum.
But in my personnel opinion this doesn't qualify for a theatrical release. But this is just my personnel opinion and nothing more.
Can't find the post yet, but I think it was a Netherland profile, where the change from 1981 to 1983 was contributed, with the note that on the comentary track 1983 was called as release date. |
| Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Astrakan: Quote: Quoting Merrik:
Quote: ...I'm entirely not sure what the Production Year actually should be? I mean, we get seven paged threads on parsing of names, I was hoping a production year debate could spark AT LEAST five pages...
11 pages: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=421436 7 pages: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=200069 5 pages, with poll: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=156334 4 pages: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=347827 3 pages, with poll: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=219532 2 pages, with poll: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=277181
And no, this is not a dig. I found these when I was participating in one of those and was looking for what others had said in the past.
KM See, now this is more like it! And don't worry, I didn't take it as a dig! VirusPil, I think the profile you're looking for is EAN 8716777039014. The contribution notes clearly state that in the commentary at 0:13:28 that the film was released in 1983. If the copyright is listed as being 1982, and the commentary from the people involved say 1983, I'm inclined to go with 1983. It wouldn't be of my personal opinion, because that's a different animal all together (I would agree with Alien and say that if it had a release in 1981 that was open to 1000 members of the public, that 1981 was the release), but for the purposes of THIS program, I would say the year should be 1983. I'd have to check my own copy to see if it includes that same commentary. | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|