Good day, Sirs,

the topic Title: Colon or Hyphen, Orginal Title: Snatch or Snatch. got locked. No idea why.

Kinoniki: I think that we don't need another thread that was just discussed for 13-pages...

Where had the Original Title been discussed before?

RAPMAN: Yes, I think so.

TheMadMartian: Like it or not, based on the rules, 'Snatch.' is correct.

dee1959jay: Agreed.

This was also my opinion.

Invelos however can't decide, one thing, then another:



It can't be that difficult to determine a simple Original Title.

So, Snatch. or Snatch?

Quoting DJ Doena:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
So, Snatch. or Snatch?

There's definitively no question mark in the title. 


Seriously, why is this title so important to you? Format it the way you want, lock it locally and then give it a rest. Don't start the umptieth poll about this.

You get a greenie from me on this response.

You submitted the data from one region to another.  Ken said he would let the people who owned that regions title decide whether or not they wanted those kinds of changes.  In this case, a third of them did not.

Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
You submitted the data from one region to another.  Ken said he would let the people who owned that regions title decide whether or not they wanted those kinds of changes.  In this case, a third of them did not.

What does this exactly mean? If I live in Finland I'm not titled to contribute to R1 profiles, even if I own them? That's insane. Does Ken verify every conributors CoO?

Funny because the other R1 locality version of the film did get accepted (the one I own  )...I'm in agreement with TheDarkKnight. If it follows the rules (which in this case it does) it should be accepted. I would resubmit it personally with the following in your notes:

Rule:
"Original Title
The Original Title field serves two general purposes, but in both cases allows for the tracking of the original feature title. Use the title from the film's credits. In cases where the title is the original title, leave the Original Title field blank."


Screen shot of title in movie on 5th post down:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=421755

Since the title is different, and the rules state nothing about ignoring punctuation, as much as I am in agreement with many of the No voters, your contribution is correct and per the rules.

Or you can give up if you want and just leave it as it is...but if not all the versions are changed we have 2 different titles in terms of CLT rather than just one, which we all know can throw off results. So personally I'd try resubmitting. 

Quoting Kulju:

Quote:
Quoting TheDarkKnight:

Quote:
No, it's about people who have the R2 DVD but change the R1 DVD which they don't own or opposite.

But how do you know if the contributor has a R1 or R2 version if he's collection is hidden?

Even when it's not hidden it takes 2 seconds to add it to your collection if one so wishes. I know that's stupid and I would never do that, but how does screeners know who has which DVD?

At least for my particular DVD, bbbbb specifically stated it was from the R2 DVD and said as such as a warning. Just to clarify, I have no problem with this, so long as it's a correct contribution. Which in this case it is.

I initially voted No because I felt exactly as the other No voters did on that other title. After RAPMAN put a screen shot up of the credits, I went and put my copy on to be sure. Sure enough, the "." is present so his contribution is correct.

Quoting Kulju:

Quote:
Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
You submitted the data from one region to another.  Ken said he would let the people who owned that regions title decide whether or not they wanted those kinds of changes.  In this case, a third of them did not.

What does this exactly mean? If I live in Finland I'm not titled to contribute to R1 profiles, even if I own them? That's insane. Does Ken verify every conributors CoO?

In his notes, he says, "Caution: the title addition was verified with the release for a RC2 locality."  That means he does not own the R1 release.  I don't know that it was the reason for the decline, just a possibility.

Edit: I see Vittra beat me to it.  Thanks mate.

Quoting TheMadMartian:

Quote:
You submitted the data from one region to another.  Ken said he would let the people who owned that regions title decide whether or not they wanted those kinds of changes.  In this case, a third of them did not.

So minority groups make the decisions? And above all things against the Rules? That cannot be right.