| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | Probably not a big deal but I've never seen this error before. I created new scans for a double feature box set parent. As is my habit, I will right click on the images and copy them and then paste them to the child profiles. I've done it a thousand times and never had any trouble. On this last one, I finished the new parent scans, did a copy of the front cover, went to paste and received a Profiler error dialog box stating "Not enough storage is available to process this command."
Well, it's certainly not disc space as I've got 50 GB available, so perhaps it's referencing memory? Anyway, thought it was odd but it's not something that I can't get around by simply copying files. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,946 |
| | Posted: | | | | Does restarting DVDpro solve the problem, or perhaps a full reboot.
Other than that, the only thing to try would be a database repair. Like you, I always use copy paste to get my scans in profiler. | | | View my collection at http://www.chriskepolis.be/home/dvd.htm
Chris |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 1,242 |
| | Posted: | | | | Sounds more like the Operating system or another program not release system memory, so perhaps as Chris suggested a system reboot.
Steve |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | Reboot cleaned it up so it must have been a memory leak. This reminds me that it's been a year, so I should probably reboot the linux box. Looking foward to the day MS builds an actual professional operating system.  |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote:
Looking foward to the day MS builds an actual professional operating system. Don't hold your breath!  | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: January 27, 2009 |  Posts: 180 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
Quoting mdnitoil:
Quote:
Looking foward to the day MS builds an actual professional operating system.
Don't hold your breath! It's been over a year since I re-booted my 2003 server. It controls the Domain, DFS, Certificate Services, DNS etc - so it gets a lot of use. I agree that the "desktop" operating systems are not very stable, but if you run the server versions as operating system, then a lot less problems. (Server 2003 for XP and Server 2008 for Vista). |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,741 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have no reason to let my desktop computer run at day and night so I haven't tested a really long-time run of my XP. But I had it once running for over a week and experienced no problems whatsoever.
And I believe one can't compare a desktop and a server computer (not the OS it's running on). A server runs specific programs. They start when the computer starts and they stay in memory as long as the computer runs. He does the same 5 tasks all day long.
On a desktop computer all kinds of programs are started and closed during a session they interact with one another (COM, ...) and they fragment the RAM. And once the RAM is fragmented enough you can't allocate large memory blocks "en bloc" and some programs need them for certain tasks. So you curse, reboot and have a clean RAM again. | | | Karsten
DVD Collectors Online
 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | Except that your description of desktop behavior only applies to Windows, regarding memory management. While the same usage pattern occurs on my Fedora box, I've never had to reboot it due to memory release issues. It just works. |
|
| Registered: January 27, 2009 | | Posts: 180 |
| | Posted: | | | | Of course you can always run a program such as RAM Defrag, which copies memory to HDD swap space and then copies it back unfragmented. Works OK, and on todays fast processers and drives, is pretty quick. |
|