It's a bit sad that a large number of feature requests users have been asking for since versions 1 and 2 haven't yet made their way to the program. I understand that any significant code additions need to be extensively tested and voted upon prior to release, or things could get messed up. The latest 3.x releases have been mainly for necessary bug fixes and have offered very little in the way of new features; apart from Country of Origin, which came totally out of the blue. Do invelos check the Feature Requests, or are they too busy running everything else? I'll pay more if it means more features are released.

...but overall, still an awesome program. ...9/10... Keep up the good work!

I agree with you Skip but it would be nice if Ken took (had) the time to tell us if he rejects a request.  I know it would make the requester unhappy and it could start a series of flaming posts but at least none of us would be waiting and hoping to see them in the subsequent release.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
I wouldn't if I were, ken for the reasons you spelled out. I waited FIVE long years for additional Crew data and there are some that I am STILL waiting for.

Skip

But that may be different, I think Ken is using you as a lab rat to test the extent of human patience

I think is interesting do like intervocative forums. One sticky post in that are listed requested we have made.

With these Ken will kwon better the requested. Requested will no be repeated. And Ken will can put is one requested is reached, and if the requested is in devealoping.

I think now are many things to implemented that are requested. The program evolution was stopped during one year, many things are requested in that period. Know one year will be work.

Imho we should have a feature request tracking similar to bugtracking (which we also need). Both could be done through the same online platforms. That way every request would have a status attached and duplicates could easily be eliminated.