Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote: Scott you said the right thing, not of interest to YOU. But the Onlinne is for ALL, and they are of interest to others. Nevertheless, there are many descrepancies between the document linked to above and the online cast list for this film. I'm happy to leave those corrections to others.
--------------- LOL, I know that scott and I am sure not going to tackle it myself, unless I do it for MYSELF. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | I would have done it, but you all know how I'm against contribution on dvd we don't own edit to move the smiley to a different picture account | | | Last edited: by Jimmy S |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | For those of you that have the Canadian locality of this title.. It was 'approved' this past week with the 'edited down' cast info from the main credits only.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote: For those of you that have the Canadian locality of this title.. It was 'approved' this past week with the 'edited down' cast info from the main credits only.. Congratulations! | | | Hal |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,414 |
| Posted: | | | | Triumph of the Data Vandals! Idiots. | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting gardibolt: Quote: Triumph of the Data Vandals! Idiots. Agreed Don't be proud of it, terry | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Terry it's really an idiotic thing that you have done after all the works that everybody did in this thread to get the documentation for the uncredited cast for this film... Hope you are proud to have trashed our group works I almost feel like making an exception to my rule and re-contribute the film with all the documented uncredited cast replace in it with a link to the original program pages. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 762 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote: For those of you that have the Canadian locality of this title.. It was 'approved' this past week with the 'edited down' cast info from the main credits only.. Why? What is it good for? | | | Last edited: by TheDarkKnight |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | I have to agree with the last 5 posters. Several users went through the effort, one even spent money, to verify that these uncredited actors were valid entries. To remove them affter all that effort was just bad form. Then to come here and brag about it, well, that was just a huge slap in the face to all of them. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I have to agree... after there was a source found and given to us they shouldn't have been removed. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: Then to come here and brag about it, well, that was just a huge slap in the face to all of them. I didn't see it as bragging, just to let the Community know what the outcome was. Should it have been withdrawn? Maybe, but it was also down to the Screeners to decide if it was a valid contribution. Rightly, wrongly or otherwise it was accepted. If people who had their data locked want to resubmit it giving links to the documentation, it's likely to be accepted back in. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote: Then to come here and brag about it, well, that was just a huge slap in the face to all of them.
I didn't see it as bragging, just to let the Community know what the outcome was.
Should it have been withdrawn? Maybe, but it was also down to the Screeners to decide if it was a valid contribution. Rightly, wrongly or otherwise it was accepted.
If people who had their data locked want to resubmit it giving links to the documentation, it's likely to be accepted back in. Agreed .. I never bragged about anything.. I just let the community know that the Candian locality was approved .. Why? I dunno I'm not a screener.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Screeners may not have seen this thread with the source. Or it could have been accidentally let through. That is why it should have just been withdrawn when the source was found. So we don't have to depend on the screeners.... and something that shouldn't have been removed wouldn't have been. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,087 |
| Posted: | | | | As we had a good source in this thread I saw no need to remove the uncredited cast. |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: Screeners may not have seen this thread with the source. Or it could have been accidentally let through. That is why it should have just been withdrawn when the source was found. So we don't have to depend on the screeners.... and something that shouldn't have been removed wouldn't have been. It's also possible that the contributor didn't see the thread before it was accepted as widescreen has no posts before saying as much. I'm not saying that is the case but various people are quick to jump on someone without having all the evidence present. |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote:
Agreed .. I never bragged about anything.. I just let the community know that the Candian locality was approved .. Why? I dunno I'm not a screener.. Terry maybe we had misinterpreted your post. I, for one, had understand that you were the one who submit the new approved profiles. So if it isn't the case sorry for the my first reaction and thanks to let us know so someone would correct it. But if my first interpretation was right my point rest that I'm really deceived by your contribution change. Is it ok with everyone if I recontribute the cast with the documentation even if I don't own the dvd? | | | Last edited: by Jimmy S |
|