Author |
Message |
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Michael A: Quote: The film was not produced by Warner Home Video - the production co. is The Lennon Documentary Group for PBS. The only significant issue here is that The Battle Over Citizen Kane is a made-for-TV documentary and is "video documentary material regarding the film, or those associated with it." The rules define such material as a "featurette" and not as a "bonus film". That should be the end of the matter if we're to pretend that the rules matter. --------------- |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 113 |
| Posted: | | | | The film played theatrically before it aired on television. It may have been funded by PBS but there are many, many theatrical films fully or partly funded by TV networks in the US and other countries around the world (the BBC's many theatrical releases eg.)
This film would not have been eligible for an Oscar had it simply been a "made-for-TV documentary".
There are precendents for this in the database already:
Full Tilt Boogie as a child profile for From Dusk Til Dawn
Hearts of Darkness as a child profile for Apocalpyse Now
Both are "video documentary material regarding the film, or those associated with it."
Anyway, that's all I have to say on the matter - it's not even my contribution. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Michael A: Quote: There are precendents for this in the database already: What you're saying is that since the rules have been broken in the past, it's OK to break them in the future. That's not a novel idea, but I think it's a bad one. --------------- |
|
Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Michael A: Quote: The film played theatrically before it aired on television. It may have been funded by PBS but there are many, many theatrical films fully or partly funded by TV networks in the US and other countries around the world (the BBC's many theatrical releases eg.)
This film would not have been eligible for an Oscar had it simply been a "made-for-TV documentary".
There are precendents for this in the database already:
Full Tilt Boogie as a child profile for From Dusk Til Dawn
Hearts of Darkness as a child profile for Apocalpyse Now
Both are "video documentary material regarding the film, or those associated with it."
Anyway, that's all I have to say on the matter - it's not even my contribution. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,414 |
| Posted: | | | | Frankly, you'll be a lot happier if you stop contributing and not bother to try to figure out this maze of rules and interpretations. Screw it. I'm keeping my profiles local and locking them. | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: What you're saying is that since the rules have been broken in the past, it's OK to break them in the future. That's not a novel idea, but I think it's a bad one. What he's saying is that this is in line with the rules. It is a theatrical feature and shoudl be tracked. This isn't the only such case and we've already settled what to do in this situation. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: this is in line with the rules. I obviously disagree. The overall feeling seems to be that since this documentary material is high quality that it "deserves" to be considered a Bonus Feature Film rather than the featurette it is, by definition. Maybe it does deserve it, but the rules here don't talk about quality, only content. --------------- | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | It has nothing to be with it being high quality. It's because the documentary was a theatrical film. There's nothing in the rules to say you shouldn't count a bonus feature because it's about the main feature. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ace_of_Sevens: Quote: There's nothing in the rules to say you shouldn't count a bonus feature because it's about the main feature. As has been pointed out several times, from The Rules: Quote: Do not confuse "Bonus Feature Films" with "Any video documentary material regarding the film, or those associated with it." Those are Featurettes. No one is saying that a bonus feature "doesn't count" because it's about the main feature. The fact that is about the main feature makes it--as defined by the rules--NOT a bonus feature. It is a featurette. It's as clear as day. But don't worry too much over it, with such an overwhelmingly positive vote I'd be shocked if it was declined. --------------- | | | Last edited: by scotthm |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:
Quote: There's nothing in the rules to say you shouldn't count a bonus feature because it's about the main feature. As has been pointed out several times, from The Rules:
Quote: Do not confuse "Bonus Feature Films" with "Any video documentary material regarding the film, or those associated with it." Those are Featurettes. No one is saying that a bonus feature "doesn't count" because it's about the main feature. The fact that is about the main feature makes it--as defined by the rules--NOT a bonus feature. It is a featurette.
It's as clear as day. But don't worry too much over it, with such an overwhelmingly positive vote I'd be shocked if it was declined.
--------------- The Battle Over Citizen Kane is not a "video documentary". It's a theatrical film. The rule you quote is about video documentaries, which this is not. Video is TV or direct-to-video; not film. | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting m.cellophane: Quote: The Battle Over Citizen Kane is not a "video documentary". It's a theatrical film. The rule you quote is about video documentaries, which this is not. Video is TV or direct-to-video; not film. I have to agree with you here...mainly because a 'video documentary' can't be nominated for an Academy Award. Only documentary films can be nominated. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| |
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 201 |
| Posted: | | | | this proves nothing " Only documentary films can be nominated." And BoCK was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. Period. | | | Last edited: by nimrod85 |
|
Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | This place is a freakin' gongshow I tell ya.
Even when someone is actually proven to be incorrect (PROVEN to be incorrect, not just someone disagreeing with them), crap like this still rages on...
Some people on this board really just like to see their friggin' name up on the screen. I can't figure another reason why shiitake mushroom like this drags on when there's no need for it. God forbid someone, anyone, actually might say "hmmm... maybe I may have been incorrect". Nope. Not on this board. NEVER. That would be like seeing the sun rise at midnight... Everyone's gotta be right to the bitter end.
Freakin' gongshow.
"It looks an awful lot like a television program to me."
Good lord... | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. | | | Last edited: by Merrik |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting m.cellophane:
Quote: The rule you quote is about video documentaries, which this is not. Video is TV or direct-to-video; not film. Here is what is actually on the DVD. All screenshots are in the order they appear in this video documentary. It looks an awful lot like a television program to me. What it looks like to you, isn't really the issue here. This documentary was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. According to the rules set forth by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, in order to be nominated it has to be a "theatrically released nonfiction motion picture dealing creatively with cultural, artistic, historical, social, scientific, economic or other subjects." When the the people responsible for the most important award an American film can get, say it is a theatrically released motion picture, I don't see how anybody can argue otherwise. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: When the the people responsible for the most important award an American film can get, say it is a theatrically released motion picture, I don't see how anybody can argue otherwise. I haven't argued otherwise. I'm sure that at least some portion (and perhaps all) of what's on the DVD was released theatrically. I'm also certain that what's on the DVD is an episode of a television series, and that this episode is "video documentary material regarding the film [Citizen Kane], or those associated with it." --------------- |
|