Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 3 4 5 6  Previous   Next
Removing uncredited cast
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,851
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:
Pop quiz
No research, just strictly memory. Who is John Williams and I don't mean the composer.. he is one who could turn up uncredited.

Isn't he Sabrina's father?

And anyone could turn up uncredited.  In what John Wayne movie will you find both Jack Benny and Cary Grant?

---------------
 Last edited: by scotthm
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:
Merrik

I promise a no vote to anyone blindly removing old uncredited data on that basis. As ken said 8 years ago there is gold data in those uncredited, he said 8 years ago.


On what basis? Undocumented (hello Mr. Self Proclaimed King of proper documentation) inclusion that was ripped of from IMDB (hello Mr. IMDB is Evil)?? If you want undocumented IMDB ripped off data in your local, be my guest. Don't force it on me though. Ken may have said 8 years ago that there is gold data in uncredited, but he also said, a whole hell of a lot less than 8 years ago that undocumented IMDB cloned uncredited cast CAN be removed.

I win.

Sorry.
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Please note: my response above it not meant to say we should remove the GOOD data. Clint Eastwood should be kept. But he shouldn't be kept in the middle of a bunch of undocumented crap from IMDB. He should be kept, properly documented.

That's what I'm getting at. I'm not going through my local blindly removing uncredited and submitting it. I'm removing the crap that was forced in a long time ago and replacing it with the good stuff that I can document.

(This is all so funny to me 'cause I actually like IMDB and think it could be useful, but it's seen as so evil around here... just gotta roll with the flow I guess).
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAlien Redrum
Proudly blocked by liars.
Registered: August 23, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,656
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Please note: my response above it not meant to say we should remove the GOOD data. Clint Eastwood should be kept. But he shouldn't be kept in the middle of a bunch of undocumented crap from IMDB. He should be kept, properly documented.

That's what I'm getting at. I'm not going through my local blindly removing uncredited and submitting it. I'm removing the crap that was forced in a long time ago and replacing it with the good stuff that I can document.

(This is all so funny to me 'cause I actually like IMDB and think it could be useful, but it's seen as so evil around here... just gotta roll with the flow I guess).


The problem, though, is you are in the minority. I've seen many times where people will want to remove whole clumps of uncredited cast with only "looks like an IMDB copy" and I always vote no on those because many times they are flat out wrong.

I used to provide links (and at least one time a screenshot) where they were wrong to remove, but now I just vote no. The burden of proof is on the person wanting the removal, and "looks like IMDB" is not good enough for me.

Don't get me wrong, I see what you are saying, but 99% of the time there is not the work put in that you would.
Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com

"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Scott - Outside of Uncredited Cast what makes you think the database is currently accurate?

I edit profiles on a daily basis and in the vast majority I find lots of mistakes and/or omissions.

Getting back to the issue of Uncredited Cast, what makes you think this data is NOT accurate? Or, that the documentation is difficult to find?

When I've run into people removing Uncredited Cast, I often research the profile to see if they should be removed.

I've done this for many hundreds of Uncredited Cast and there was only 1 person who I could not find data on.

So, it is my experience that it is easy to find information on Uncredited Cast and would hope that people would take the time to provide this documentation.

I believe the database would be better served if people would contribute the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of easy, undisputed data first before removing other data that might very well be correct.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMerrik
NON-STEPFORD PROFILER
Registered: September 30, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,805
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Alien Redrum:
Quote:
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Please note: my response above it not meant to say we should remove the GOOD data. Clint Eastwood should be kept. But he shouldn't be kept in the middle of a bunch of undocumented crap from IMDB. He should be kept, properly documented.

That's what I'm getting at. I'm not going through my local blindly removing uncredited and submitting it. I'm removing the crap that was forced in a long time ago and replacing it with the good stuff that I can document.

(This is all so funny to me 'cause I actually like IMDB and think it could be useful, but it's seen as so evil around here... just gotta roll with the flow I guess).


The problem, though, is you are in the minority.


Story of my happy funtimeing life. Please leave my sexuality out of the conversation please!     
The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play.
 Last edited: by Merrik
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantAlien Redrum
Proudly blocked by liars.
Registered: August 23, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,656
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Quoting Alien Redrum:
Quote:
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Please note: my response above it not meant to say we should remove the GOOD data. Clint Eastwood should be kept. But he shouldn't be kept in the middle of a bunch of undocumented crap from IMDB. He should be kept, properly documented.

That's what I'm getting at. I'm not going through my local blindly removing uncredited and submitting it. I'm removing the crap that was forced in a long time ago and replacing it with the good stuff that I can document.

(This is all so funny to me 'cause I actually like IMDB and think it could be useful, but it's seen as so evil around here... just gotta roll with the flow I guess).


The problem, though, is you are in the minority.


Story of my happy funtimeing life. Please leave my sexuality out of the conversation please!     


Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com

"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,494
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'm always amused at the fact how Amazon and  a host of other DVD 's sites will  use IMDB for all their cast and crew means .. but one would hope and suspect that eventually Invelos Profiler should be used for these sites to scrape data off since 'we ' are so perfect in every way ....
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Merrik
Don't get me wrong, I understand you and don't forget when Ken made his comments years ago I was supporting clearing the decks and starting uncredited from the beginning. Time and knowledge proved to me that was not a good plan. How do we know nugget when we see one, in the case of Clint Eastwood 50 plus years answers that question. That old uncredited data predates 2005 so by now we may be able to see the nuggets more clearly. But today's extra could be tomorrow's star, we can't immediately. I would say just tread very carefully before attempting to remove old uncredited and please don't do it blindly, just because. I don't think that is asking too much.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Terry
Amazon owns IMDb and have for about 10 years. As I noted IMDb made some changes in their own system and rules after we made our changes...nuff said
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorJimmy S
Registered: March 15, 2007
Canada Posts: 1,982
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Winston Smith:
Quote:

I promise a no vote to anyone blindly removing old uncredited data on that basis. As ken said 8 years ago there is gold data in those uncredited, he said 8 years ago.

As I would. Funny thing is that most of the user who don't get it in that thread weren't there when no contribution note were needed for new profile (except Scott, but usually he disagree to disagree so I take his opinion with a grain of salt). Nobody say it isn't better to document the uncredited, what we say is that we can't say for those older profiles if the documenting work was done or not because it wasn't necessary to document the new profile at that time. For one I won't removed informations that people could had works hours to find from the database, but if I don't like or don't trust something I will remove it from my database.

Anyway I'm done with that topic as everything is said.
 Last edited: by Jimmy S
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantjohnd
Evening, poetry lovers.
Registered: March 13, 2007
Australia Posts: 298
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Since this seems to have wandered a bit, I'll just re-state my issue:

Submissions are being posted stating that uncredited cast are being removed because:

The submitter can't find supporting information - for all submissions like this that I have voted no for, I have been able to find supporting information within a minute. To me, this means that the submitter did not do any real research.

Looks too much like IMDB - the assumption here is that the information in IMDB came from nowhere, with no providence. This assumption is clearly incorrect.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I would vote no, john. Just because as I stated is not acceptable in my book.
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorSrehtims
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 1,796
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Quoting Srehtims:
Quote:
You could go to the Intervocative and see if a given profile is there and compare for uncreditede credits..


The link doesn't work.


I fixed it although it has been a few years since I logged  in.
We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own.
Ineptocracy, You got to love it.
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRutan
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Australia Posts: 2,378
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I thought I would put my thoughts into this as I seem to have been the cause of this current thread. . I was doing the update because I will be giving ths DVD away as I now have the BD. I had a look at the cast and to me looked exactly like a copy of the IMDB.

When johnd voted no I recognised that he wanted the data and it was a grandfathered profile from the Intervocative days and withrew my contribution immediately.

I have now submitted a new update with some minor changes to the uncredited tick boxes.

If people want this data then I will not stand in their way.

I only tackle profiles where the IMDB no longer even says the person is credited. I also do no like to see Scenes deleted or people with no apparent role.

I know some time ago I had to fight to keep the late Michael O'hare in D-Tox because the old evidence was with the Intervocative site.

I personly add uncredited actors when I can see them in the film myself.

Cheers
Kelvin
 Last edited: by Rutan
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRutan
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Australia Posts: 2,378
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
What I am saying is that I made a mistake! And should have done some research before blowing the data away.
 Last edited: by Rutan
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 3 4 5 6  Previous   Next