Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
i was just wondering if there is a way to tell when a contribution is declined what it's declined for? I tried to contribute info on "Van Helsing" and it was declined. it had like 4 yes votes and one no. the no was something like "MC should be this" without documentation or a reason why it should be. is the reaon it was declined because the no voter has more clout than the contributor and the 4 yes voters? it kind of makes the whole "voting" system pretty wack. it reminds me of "Hell's Kitchen" where Gordon asks one chef to pick two chefs up for elimination, only to go and choose whoever he sees fit to eliminate. i wanna know who is DVDProfiler's Gordon Ramsay!

Ok, let me explain my reply to you. I was trying to tell you, that it is not about how many votes or who votes. It's about the things that the voters point out to the screeners. That's what I wrote in my post. I tried to answer your question. You didn't give a UPC or anything so I couldn't look at this profile. You asked if certain voters had more impact on the outcome and I tried to explain to you that this voting system is only there to help the screeners and the voters are there to assist if you want to say it like that. The reasons for the "no" votes are in my oppinion the most important part of the voting process. If a voter finds a valid reason to vote "no" the contribution should be declined. Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone.

@samuelrichardscott  You are absolutely correct but it seems that brimac5477 just doesn't want to understand that I answered his question.

Quote:
Quoting TheDarkKnight:

Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
i was just wondering if there is a way to tell when a contribution is declined what it's declined for? I tried to contribute info on "Van Helsing" and it was declined. it had like 4 yes votes and one no. the no was something like "MC should be this" without documentation or a reason why it should be. is the reaon it was declined because the no voter has more clout than the contributor and the 4 yes voters? it kind of makes the whole "voting" system pretty wack. it reminds me of "Hell's Kitchen" where Gordon asks one chef to pick two chefs up for elimination, only to go and choose whoever he sees fit to eliminate. i wanna know who is DVDProfiler's Gordon Ramsay!

Ok, let me explain my reply to you. I was trying to tell you, that it is not about how many votes or who votes. It's about the things that the voters point out to the screeners. That's what I wrote in my post. I tried to answer your question. You didn't give a UPC or anything so I couldn't look at this profile. You asked if certain voters had more impact on the outcome and I tried to explain to you that this voting system is only there to help the screeners and the voters are there to assist if you want to say it like that. The reasons for the "no" votes are in my oppinion the most important part of the voting process. If a voter finds a valid reason to vote "no" the contribution should be declined. Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone.

@samuelrichardscott  You are absolutely correct but it seems that brimac5477 just doesn't want to understand that I answered his question.

this response was much better! if you would have asked for the upc i would have given it to you. but CharlieM gave me a perfect answer and told me where to find info. i would have given this response a green arrow untill "Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone" i really have let it go. i have no ill will towards you! i'm sure there will be something in the future i might need your help on. sorry dude if i pissed you off!
p.s. i asked where to find MC in my contribution notes. sorry bud.

Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
Quoting TheDarkKnight:

Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
i was just wondering if there is a way to tell when a contribution is declined what it's declined for? I tried to contribute info on "Van Helsing" and it was declined. it had like 4 yes votes and one no. the no was something like "MC should be this" without documentation or a reason why it should be. is the reaon it was declined because the no voter has more clout than the contributor and the 4 yes voters? it kind of makes the whole "voting" system pretty wack. it reminds me of "Hell's Kitchen" where Gordon asks one chef to pick two chefs up for elimination, only to go and choose whoever he sees fit to eliminate. i wanna know who is DVDProfiler's Gordon Ramsay!

Ok, let me explain my reply to you. I was trying to tell you, that it is not about how many votes or who votes. It's about the things that the voters point out to the screeners. That's what I wrote in my post. I tried to answer your question. You didn't give a UPC or anything so I couldn't look at this profile. You asked if certain voters had more impact on the outcome and I tried to explain to you that this voting system is only there to help the screeners and the voters are there to assist if you want to say it like that. The reasons for the "no" votes are in my oppinion the most important part of the voting process. If a voter finds a valid reason to vote "no" the contribution should be declined. Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone.

@samuelrichardscott  You are absolutely correct but it seems that brimac5477 just doesn't want to understand that I answered his question.

this response was much better! if you would have asked for the upc i would have given it to you. but CharlieM gave me a perfect answer and told me where to find info. i would have given this response a green arrow untill "Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone" i really have let it go. i have no ill will towards you! i'm sure there will be something in the future i might need your help on. sorry dude if i pissed you off!
p.s. i asked where to find MC in my contribution notes. sorry bud.

No hard feelings. 

BUT NOW, WHERE IS THE FREE BEER???????????????????????????

Quote:
Still waiting for my beer......

Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
Quoting TheDarkKnight:

Quote:
Quoting brimac5477:

Quote:
i was just wondering if there is a way to tell when a contribution is declined what it's declined for? I tried to contribute info on "Van Helsing" and it was declined. it had like 4 yes votes and one no. the no was something like "MC should be this" without documentation or a reason why it should be. is the reaon it was declined because the no voter has more clout than the contributor and the 4 yes voters? it kind of makes the whole "voting" system pretty wack. it reminds me of "Hell's Kitchen" where Gordon asks one chef to pick two chefs up for elimination, only to go and choose whoever he sees fit to eliminate. i wanna know who is DVDProfiler's Gordon Ramsay!

Ok, let me explain my reply to you. I was trying to tell you, that it is not about how many votes or who votes. It's about the things that the voters point out to the screeners. That's what I wrote in my post. I tried to answer your question. You didn't give a UPC or anything so I couldn't look at this profile. You asked if certain voters had more impact on the outcome and I tried to explain to you that this voting system is only there to help the screeners and the voters are there to assist if you want to say it like that. The reasons for the "no" votes are in my oppinion the most important part of the voting process. If a voter finds a valid reason to vote "no" the contribution should be declined. Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone.

@samuelrichardscott  You are absolutely correct but it seems that brimac5477 just doesn't want to understand that I answered his question.

this response was much better! if you would have asked for the upc i would have given it to you. but CharlieM gave me a perfect answer and told me where to find info. i would have given this response a green arrow untill "Your attitude towards my answer is really getting me annoyed, please just leave it alone" i really have let it go. i have no ill will towards you! i'm sure there will be something in the future i might need your help on. sorry dude if i pissed you off!
p.s. i asked where to find MC in my contribution notes. sorry bud.

No hard feelings. 

BUT NOW, WHERE IS THE FREE BEER???????????????????????????