Sam:

There are a numbber of users who have ruined it for me a long time ago and they continue to make it worse. You are very judegmental for someone who only posted today for the first time and that to be insulting and argumetative. Very bad form.

Skip

   

"insulting" and "argumetative". Irony.

   

Anywho, back on topic, yeah, a No vote is best here, especially if there are errors. If there was a huge update, such as cast and scans and such, I'd do as Voltaire and someone else mentioned and vote yes, but drop a note about the small mistakes.

But a definite no if the only thing updated is WRONG leading to BAD DATA.

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
you are abusing your voting rights.

That's rich, coming from you. I only see you abusing your voting rights literally every single day. 

(Facts and figures readily available upon request: I've got several of these occasions in my voting queue right now.)

Touché!

For me it's quite simple:
- If there's a tiny error or ommission, I tend to vote Yes but mark in my vote the error/omission, asking to adapt the submission accordingly
- If there's a substantial error, I vote No but include the reason why
- If an existing error gets corrected by another error: I vote no and also explain why in my voting notes

Quoting Alien Redrum:

Quote:
Anywho, back on topic, yeah, a No vote is best here, especially if there are errors. If there was a huge update, such as cast and scans and such, I'd do as Voltaire and someone else mentioned and vote yes, but drop a note about the small mistakes.

But a definite no if the only thing updated is WRONG leading to BAD DATA.

On topic, this what I would be inclined to do.

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

BUT, just as with another user who behaves in the same manner, once the issue is corrected I seldom have seen him return to vote Yes. Skip

Just to clarify this. If the said contribution has additional data which I don't check (ie cast or creditted as), I vote neutral. Or if it has an image that I may not particularly agree is an improvement, then I vote neutral. That is why on occasion you might not see a YES after fixing one of the many problems.

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

This whole poll is simply that he got upset

Skip

I'm not upset at all - this is just a website in connection to my hobby


Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

but don't piss on my pants and tell me it's raining. Skip

Not quite sure what this means 

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

Clearly, to me richie is not interested in treating people with respect, he simply wants to be able to run amuck and make up his own Rules,

Skip

This I am afraid is where you step over the mark and get personal. I'd confidently say no-one else in my several years here has ever felt I'd treated them with disrespect, nor would I be a likely candidate for someone who 'runs amuck'

Quoting Jubal:

Quote:
Kathy:

respectfully he brings it here and whines.

Skip

I am not whining. Please re-read my initial post. It is a question to other users as I was concerned i may have been incorrectly voting on submissions

And under the circumstances, richie, I will continue to point your abuse of the Rules.. I would even be willing to accept a NO vote with a PM, to make sure it is not overlooked. But otherwise, you are simply flaunting the Rules as I have described and i will point it out everytime. If you have no respect for me then I have none for you. It is up to you. You want things other than what I address fixed, you know how to achieve it, otherwise FIX IT YOURSELF.

Skip

If a contribution contains errors, I vote 'no'.  I will not PM a user and I will not vote 'yes' with a comment.  I do not review 'yes' votes that I get, so I don't expect it from anyone else.

As I have noted repeatedly, it is not richie's No vote or comment that bothers me. What bothers me is that until the last couple of days, when I called him on it, he would Vote No but when the issue was addressed that he voted No on, he would not return and vote Yes. Now THISibehavior is what annoys me and that i find disrespectful as well as downright insulting. I find it the same from James. I certainly have no way to explain this behavior other than these users have some sort of an issue, it is their issue and not mine. I don't hold grudges against anybody, but i cannot explain this unacceptable behavior. You vote No and explain the problem, it gets fixed and you then ignore it, excuse me this just flat out RUDE in my book.

I am willing to give these people another chance at this,but if this behavior continues, then NO in my book they are ignoring the Rules and voting based on something else and they can then fix whatever problem they see rthemselves.

So the problem gets fixed I expect to see a response. we will see, I guess, won't we. This does include you to James.

Skip