Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
Handling of Child Profiles on Multi-Movie, Multi-Disc Sets |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: May 25, 2007 | Posts: 127 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Corne: Quote: For example, UPC/EAN: 5050582435481 Marlene Dietrich: Screen Goddess Collection (UK). This box set contains 3 other box sets (with different EAN/UPC codes). These box sets contain each 2 DVDs. In total 6 movies. These 3 box sets are the child profiles of the "grand" box set and the Disc IDs are the child profiles of these 3 box sets. The box set should be left out and the Disc IDs of the 6 movies should be added as direct child profiles of the grand box set? If the sets within the sets have their own UPC and the UPC is on a case within a case, then that's different. because it means that the inner cases are also sold separately. In that case the movies would be attached to the UPC they're in. In this case the grand box is usually treated as a slipcase or liiteral box. What makes it tricky is that Echo Bridge sometimes puts separate UPCs on the discs themselves. If the UPC is only on the disc and nowhere else then I've been just attaching the child profiles to the grand box. | | | Last edited: by AndyEN |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | That’s a different kind of animal, indeed. Agree with Andy. |
| | Corne | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't see a difference , sorry. | | | Cor |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Please take a look at the examples at the bottom of this page: http://www.invelos.com/dvdpro/contributions/Rules.aspx?display=altversions.
Your case is similar to the second example, the OP’s case is similar to the last one. |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | In your case, the intermediate profile level is UPC/EAN-based, in the OP’s case it is Disc ID-based. Per the rules, the former type of profile is allowed, the latter is not. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,439 |
| Posted: | | | | This (highlighted) note in the Alternate Versions section of the rules covers the OP's question.
Note: Do not create and contribute a disc ID profile with multiple movies:
UPC Entry: (Movie 1/Movie 2) data Disc ID A: (Movie 1/Movie 2) data Disc ID A Entry (Variant ID #1): Movie 1 data Disc ID A Entry (Variant ID #2): Movie 2 data
That box-set (UPC 777966898797) is currently incorrect in the online database. | | | Registered: February 10, 2002 |
| Registered: May 25, 2007 | Posts: 127 |
| Posted: | | | | Two differences off the top of my head if the case within the case has its own UPC.
1. Expediency. Because the case within the case has its own UPC and therefore is sold separately as well, there's a good chance that it already has its own profile that can be downloaded and be added to the case. Conversely, if such a profile does not yet exist it will need to be created eventually anyway for people who own one or more part of the set within the set but don't own the larger set.
2. Release date: The version within the case could conceivably have a different release date than the box set due to being sold separately as well. However, discs within a single case are treated as having the same release date as the core profile. Even if the same disc is used in more than one set (Echo Bridge is pretty shameless here), the disc within a particular box is treated as having the same release date (and images unless packaged separately) as the core profile; in the set we're debating the images are shared by all three discs. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|