And know other people with 'one' eye, or see very badly or got other problems. But all say that the 3D effects work very well Go to a video store, where they sell the 3D stuff, and try it i would do that, if i was you, i would do that.

One title that hasn't been mentioned that I was surprised with the 3D: Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter.

You'll find most 3D titles aren't filmed in 3D, it's just when they use green screen production and add the 3D with the post production rendering. A lot of the titles you have ordered you will be disappointed with :-)

As to Addicted2DVD question, yes it will work but of course you'll lose some depth due to only using one eye.

Stereoscopic 3D means 3D achieved by sending different pictures to each eye (as opposed to animation using 3D models and such which produces a 2d final product and stuff that really is 3d, like holograms and the real world). Anaglyph and active shutter glasses are both stereoscopic. They used polarized glasses in the 1950s as , though they didn't work as well because it was linear polarization, which means the effect broke if your head tilted. Also, you had to align two projectors, which is impossible to do perfectly. You can't polarize TV (not CRTs, anyway), so they were shown on TV in anaglyph, but this was never the leading tech.

As for recommendations, definitely Tangled.

Thanks all. I have about 40 on the way, which will do me for now!

@Addicted (Pete),

Viewing in 3D, i.e. stereoscopic 'depth' view, requires sight in both eyes, each receiving a slightly different image.

That said, because of the eye's natural characteristic to focus on a certain distance, anything not into focus will be blurred, more so if the distance to the focal point is more. Of course, nature tends to itself so most of the time we do not notice it. Likewise for perspective distortion, like a ball that comes straight at you and visually becomes way bigger than it 'should' be. Your brain will perceive it as a threat (duck !) and so as a form of perceived depth.

Having just one good eye means you can't have real stereoscopic 'depth' view and that's all. But the natural blurring of objects not at the focal point will create a 'perceived depth' in your brain. Combine it with perspective distortion and one can have a lot of 'perceived depth'. Oh, and before I overlook it, the careful, deliberate (mis-)placement of shadows of objects also adds to the perceived depth, i.e. what the brain thinks the distance is of that object to its surroudings.
I'd speculate that people that lose an eye at a later age --and so their brain has experienced stereoscopic depth view-- will be more susceptable to perceived depth than people that have just one good eye from birth. Just guessing, but it seems probable.

Current day 3D movies exploit 'perceived depth' on top of stereoscopic view, as directors say, to 'enhance the 3D viewing experience'. IOW, lots of intended if not exagerated blurred and focused objects in one frame and ditto perspective distortion.
I didn't check it to the detail but I suspect some 3D versions of some titles have these enhancements that are not present in the 2D copy. But I've seen also 2D copies that had very great 3D effects, for instance in title sequences.

IOW, 3D movies without 'enhancements' will NOT work for you. IMO it is completely useless for you to have a 3D set-up (3D TV, glasses, 3D player) as only one eye works. OTOH, if the rest of your family can see with both eyes, it may be a different investment story  .

No problem... Thanks everyone! 

I ordered Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter and pre-ordered three Universe documentaries from the History Channel. Looking forward to them. I did see that they are releasing Top Gun in 3D in the USA. I'm interested in reviews on that one when it is released.

Although I don't personally have a 3D setup, I read that the new Top Gun release is very well done. Review can be found here.