| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 21 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hallo-marvin: Quote:
I agree with VirusPil, front cover without logo, backcover with EAN. Me too. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,217 |
| |
| Registered: June 20, 2007 | | Posts: 85 |
| | Posted: | | | | I don't care......or better said, i mostly contribute the front with the logo ( in the rare cases of Cover contributions from me ), and maybe take the other side locally.
The only annoying thing at this could be, that there are persons who give a no vote because they would prefer the other side of the Cover.....and yes, such an reason for the no vote was given at an actual contribution from me.... |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote:
From the ones I've seen it's the same artwork minus the ratings logo but I've heard some are different. The ruling given was that if it's the same other than the logo then the side without the logo could be used. What about, for instance, a missing BD-Live logo on the backside of the actual cover? Expendable? | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote:
From the ones I've seen it's the same artwork minus the ratings logo but I've heard some are different. The ruling given was that if it's the same other than the logo then the side without the logo could be used.
What about, for instance, a missing BD-Live logo on the backside of the actual cover? Expendable? I think in one discussion to this theme Ken wrote: "So, as long as the flip cover otherwise matches the front, I don't see a problem submitting it." Hmm, "matches the front" does mean, it must be exactly same? If yes, the missing BD-Love Logo would be a reason for a no vote. Never got in this case, (Could also be i've overseen something) so i can't say what i would do in this case.  |
|
| Registered: May 23, 2007 | | Posts: 38 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
What about, for instance, a missing BD-Live logo on the backside of the actual cover? Expendable? You are talking about Terminator 4, aren't you? I would not miss it. But: According to the rules you have to take the one with BD-Live Logo, because the missing BD-Live logo would be a second difference on the Frontside and therefore not allowed. Otherwise, the voters are deciding what they want. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,217 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting fornie: Quote:
But: According to the rules you have to take the one with BD-Live Logo, because the missing BD-Live logo would be a second difference on the Frontside and therefore not allowed. Unfortunately, yes. OTOH who would notice the difference if the BD-Live-Logo is montaged into the clearly superior existing scans instead of those washed-out that were submitted?  cya, Mithi | | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting VirusPil: Quote:
... so i can't say what i would do in this case. Now i had this case. To my shame i voted no because of the worse quality. (To my more shame i have to say i needed a second and third see on the cover to notice that the BD-Live logo is missing) But imho i must say the Wendecover still "matches" the front. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting fornie: Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:
Quote:
What about, for instance, a missing BD-Live logo on the backside of the actual cover? Expendable?
You are talking about Terminator 4, aren't you?
Terminator Salvation, for instance. Quote:
I would not miss it. | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|