Well, the problem, Tim is that in my book YOU are abusing your Contribution Privileges, should I start pointing that out. You obviously have a problem with differing points of view, what an ego you have man. Shall I...sure it was you who told me that you had just crossed the 20,000 Contribution, just keep stroking that ego. I told you and i am very serious, I have NO IDEA what number of Contributions I have made, posts or most any other possible stat, I do keep track of my backup file size simply for humor reasons. How many of those Contributions you have made are for the same title over and over and over again and again, how many times have made some change to Bill & Ted, you usually make one or two changes at a time, and the next week a couple morte, and so on. It looks to me like you do this so that you can inflate your Contribution numbers, i don't care about any of that, Tim, I work ONLY for the benefit of the Community, not my own ego. I was floored when you bragged about that to me, and could only shake my head at the implications it carried.

I think a valid argument could be made that you launch your attacks in order to direct attention from a Contribution which know either violates the Rules, Ken and gerri's comments, or is so pathetically verified and documented. It's called the old game of misdirection, make sure they never get to see what your right hand is doing, keep it all focused on the left. Sad.

Skip

Ken said

"One additional reminder to please keep the contribution vote notes completely civil at all times."

Tim & James probably construe that to mean he can say whatever he likes in his Contribution Notes.

Skip

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
Exactly. If someone votes in violation of the rules and/or Ken's comments, I have no choice but to point that out for both the voters and the screeners to see. Invelos has previously publicly stated that it's okay, even helpful, to do so. Whenever that need arises, I try to do so in a strictly matter-of-factly matter, although unsurprisingly, exactly how baffled I am at the complete and utter ridiculousness of some of these votes may sometimes shine through just a little bit. To be sure, I've reviewed the latest batch, but I don't consider any of them to be attacks - IMHO they're nothing more than appropriate responses to completely invalid and unfounded "no"-votes. I really can't help the fact that Skip automatically considers anyone disagreeing with him to be "highly offensive".

These are your notes:

Quote:
Don't lie, Skip! You know perfectly well what Ken decided:
Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:

If you are contributing to a profile that you don't own, our only requirement is that the notes submitted accurately reflect the source of the data, and state the specific profile used as the source.

And I did exactly that. Now, is this new art crew an improvement, or isn't it? You really need to stop your destructive attempts to keep good data out of the database.

You said "Don't Lie Skip!"  That is the same as calling him a liar, which is an attack.  You went on to talk about his 'destructive attempts' and included a  .  Again, an attack.

An appropriate response would have been something along the lines of, "To the single 'no' vote, as indicated by Ken's posts in this thread, especially the one on page 17, the profile does not have to be blank."

In addition, while you his comments may not reflect what Ken said, Skip is well within his rights to vote no.  Ken said, "I would tend to allow the voters who actually own the submitted locality to make the call."  That means each person, who owns that profile, can decide whether or not they want the data.  Whether or not the data is 'good' isn't an issue for these kinds of contributions.

Quoting Unicus69:

Quote:
Whether or not the data is 'good' isn't an issue for these kinds of contributions.

Yes - heaven forbid the fact whether or not the data is 'good' would come into play. That's just a minor detail in the whole process, isn't it?   

Quoting Dr Pavlov:

Quote:
your behavior is totally UNACCEPTABLE.

Likewise! 

Look: I'm really not going to let myself be dragged into this any further - you've wasted enough of everyone's time. I'm gonna go audit some profiles instead.

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
Quoting Dr Pavlov:

Quote:
your behavior is totally UNACCEPTABLE.

Likewise! 

Look: I'm really not going to let myself be dragged into this any further - you've wasted enough of everyone's time. I'm gonna go audit some profiles instead.

How typical, ROFLMAO. You attack another user, as you do frequently, and then when someone, in this case, not even the user whom you attacked, calls you on it (indirectly), you get defensive and act as if you are the agrieved. I don't think so.

I repeat as long as continue to submit what I view as CRAP , I will vote NO, each and every time and I hope that some users will join me, before you start abbreviating your contribution notes even firther.

Skip<shakes head>

Another attack, Son, you have no idea, come to America sometime and I will show you how pathetic and little I am. What is a shame is that yoiu are rewarded for your crass behavior.

UNBELIEVABLE

Skip

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
Okay, let's play without the kid gloves for once, then:

You are a pathetic, sad, little old man, and I refuse to deal with your nonsense and continued lies any further. 

Over and out.

Wow, just wow.  I don't know what you hoped to accomplish, but all we are going to end up with is another thread that is going to be locked or edited.  This is really getting old.