Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I swap you the bridge for some South Florida swampland | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | Posts: 4,282 |
| Posted: | | | | My daughters are in to Crocs (at least I think they're still "in"), but I don't think that's the kind they're after. | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | As I said above, my only worry was that people could twist the wording to mean that if an extended cut was mentioned as a special feature, and the special features were stated to be not rated, then the rating could be removed.
But if no one else has this worry, I'm happy that the new wording should protect those profiles that include extended cuts, but not necessarily "unrated" cuts. |
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,879 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DarklyNoon: Quote: So why would anyone want to enter PG / R-Rated / PG-13 or something like this, if there is also an UNRATED / NOT RATED version on the disk ??? I'll try to give some reasons. First - unless adding the Unrated option is implemented - I support the rule as it's currently written. And the reasons I'm going to give cover why. However, adding an option of Unrated to the drop down would solve the reasons I would use any rating over NR and (it seems) satisfy those who don't want to use the rating. Right now, locally I enter ratings for any film that was previously rated, whether or not the rated version exists on the disc or not, and lock that field. So, onto those reasons: 1. What does NR tell you? What information does it impart? Absolutely nothing. It tells you nothing about the content of a film. While the US ratings system is far from perfect, some information is better than none. 1a. If I'm picking a movie for movie night with my friends, the more info the better to pick one that we might all enjoy. 1b. I have a lot of blind buys, so I may not know the film ahead of time. Again, more info = better. 2. Let's say we have a film that's rated R for Strong Language and Graphic Bloody Violence. It gets released on DVD in an Unrated cut. The strong language and graphic bloody violence will still be present. 3. DVD Profiler considers NR to be the lowest rating, not the highest. While people may personally consider Unrated higher than R, the software does not consider it thus. Therefore, if I want to sort films by rating (as in content) I will get them more correctly sorted by entering the rating. 4. Also, we were previously told to enter the highest rating when more than one version is present. 4a. ANY rating is higher than NO rating. 4b. As I said above, the software considers NR the LOWEST rating. 5. While I don't use Parental Controls (don't have kids), if I did I would want them to actually work properly. Entering that Unrated Cut of an R film as NR would place that film in the incorrect group for the parental controls. That puts something like the unrated cut of American Psycho in the same group as Barbie as Rapunzel or Top Hat. Now, having the option of Unrated for these cuts would seem to solve all of these points, and satisfy the majority of those who do not want to enter the rating for the Unrated version. So I would support that option. | | | If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. -- Thorin Oakenshield | | | Last edited: by Danae Cassandra |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Ken Cole: Quote: Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:
Quote: North:
That is essentially what we have been doing for FIVE years, and it has never caused a problem, not one that I can ever recall seeing. Once in awhile a newbie will ask and one of us will explain it and it's done. But it has never been an issue, until Ken made this change. The old saying works; If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
It was broken. It did not cover this condition. I'm not sure how much more clearly I can state this. If you honestly believe I invent rule changes due to lack of things to do, I have a bridge to sell you. I don't think that at all, Ken. But, conditionals aren't the answer. They really do only serve to confound and confuse, and currently we have far too many. I can guess why, from your viewpoint, but...A conditional used to tell me that I needed to look at the code again, there are going to be conditionals in any database, but 95% of the time they are not necessary and can be handled with code so that there is no need for ANY form of conditional. In this case, it could be handled quite effectively by adding another field for Rating data this could serve a dual role (or perhaps even a third field) it could be used to capture the data which is common outside of R! US, where they must rate everything, and with a third field it could be used track multi-"rated" sets, or if you prefer Rated and Unrated/NR. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Danae Cassandra: Quote: Now, having the option of Unrated for these cuts would seem to solve all of these points, and satisfy the majority of those who do not want to enter the rating for the Unrated version. So I would support that option. I see your point, but if Ken did add something like "Unrated" to the ratings field, then how would we define that in the rules? What's to stop someone who finds the humour in The Simpsons objectionable, for example, deciding that they should be Unrated rather than NR? |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | This is what I suggested a few pages back, and I think it is similar to what Pete suggested:
"Use the Rating shown on the DVD cover. Exceptions: Use "Unrated" for any release that includes, or is, an unrated/not rated version of a rated film. Use "NR" for any release without a rating."
This, of course, assumes we get an 'Unrated' rating. If we don't, then it would be changed, to 'NR'. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: This is what I suggested a few pages back, and I think it is similar to what Pete suggested:
"Use the Rating shown on the DVD cover. Exceptions: Use "Unrated" for any release that includes, or is, an unrated/not rated version of a rated film. Use "NR" for any release without a rating."
This, of course, assumes we get an 'Unrated' rating. If we don't, then it would be changed, to 'NR'. I am not sure I like this. If a film is rated "R" from the theater, dvd Profiler allows me to set that age limit If a film is PG-13, I can Set that age limit. If a film is UnRated, where do I set the age limit, unless I set it for every disc. There has to be a way to establish a base age on an unrated disc, based upon it's original MPAA (or your local rating agency) that was for the original Movie. If the Theatrical Movie is rated "'R" then the base for an unrated disc should be "R" + Likewise, if a movie is rated "PG-13" at the theater, then an unrated version needs to be "PG-13"+ I do not see what information can come out of a generic "Unrated" rating. IMHO Charlie |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | If we get the 'Unrated' rating, it would have to be set as stronger than 'R' as that is the point. That being said, I have to admit that I am not understanding the issue here. If you...the general 'you', not the specific 'you'...are worried about the content, why buy the unrated version? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: August 23, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,656 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: This is what I suggested a few pages back, and I think it is similar to what Pete suggested:
"Use the Rating shown on the DVD cover. Exceptions: Use "Unrated" for any release that includes, or is, an unrated/not rated version of a rated film. Use "NR" for any release without a rating."
This, of course, assumes we get an 'Unrated' rating. If we don't, then it would be changed, to 'NR'. I would love to see this as unrated and not rated are two different things. | | | Reviewer, HorrorTalk.com
"I also refuse to document CLT results and I pay my bills to avoid going to court." - Sam, keeping it real, yo. |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: If we get the 'Unrated' rating, it would have to be set as stronger than 'R' as that is the point.
That being said, I have to admit that I am not understanding the issue here. If you...the general 'you', not the specific 'you'...are worried about the content, why buy the unrated version? Again, it comes to children. We have children, when my child looks for a movie to watch, he knows better than to come and ask me for an age unappropriate movie. Without a valid ratings system, I would be asked many questions.... |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: Ok Donnie, using my X-Men example.
It's a PG-13 film (as noted on the back of the cover), however there is an option to play the film with deleted scenes added via branching. This version of the film is technically unrated, it was never submitted to the MPAA. It's not advertised as Unrated, it's not advertised as a Director's Cut. What rating would you give the profile? Of course we only enter Unrated / Not rated, when the DVD / Blu-ray is labeled this way, we do not invent any UNrated rating. if the disk is clearly labeled PG-13, that is what we enter. But if the disk has a PG-13 and an Unrated version on it, we label it Unrated and forget about the PG-13 version Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com | | | Last edited: by DarklyNoon |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Prof. Kingsfield: Quote: What Pete is describing has been the way it has been done for the last five years, north. And frankly, I have seldom if ever seen ANY form of controversy with it. It's easy from a data entry viewpoint and it has NO conditionals. That is what I am preaching too | | | www.tvmaze.com |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DarklyNoon: Quote: Quoting northbloke:
Quote: Ok Donnie, using my X-Men example.
It's a PG-13 film (as noted on the back of the cover), however there is an option to play the film with deleted scenes added via branching. This version of the film is technically unrated, it was never submitted to the MPAA. It's not advertised as Unrated, it's not advertised as a Director's Cut. What rating would you give the profile?
Of course we only enter Unrated / Not rated, when the DVD / Blu-ray is labeled this way, we do not invent any UNrated rating. if the disk is clearly labeled PG-13, that is what we enter. But if the disk has a PG-13 and an Unrated version on it, we label it Unrated and forget about the PG-13 version
Donnie So for that PG-13 theatrical release, that is now unrated DVD, what is the appropriate age for that movie that I can set? If another movie was rated "R" at the theater and is now "Unrated", what is that appropriate age level that can be set? In the previous 2 examples, are the appropriate age the same? An unrated film, has to have a basis in the theatrical rating. There are not many films that take out the "R" stuff to get unrated. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: The problem with that wording is the UK would need an exception. Not because of Unrated, which we don't have, but because several releases get higher ratings due to bonus content. Not only the UK, Germany as well and maybe most of Europe handle ratings for the entire disc/package by law. |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,945 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: This is what I suggested a few pages back, and I think it is similar to what Pete suggested:
"Use the Rating shown on the DVD cover. Exceptions: Use "Unrated" for any release that includes, or is, an unrated/not rated version of a rated film. Use "NR" for any release without a rating."
This, of course, assumes we get an 'Unrated' rating. If we don't, then it would be changed, to 'NR'. Couldn't have said it any better! Donnie | | | www.tvmaze.com |
|
|