| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 16, 2007 |  Posts: 278 |
| | Posted: | | | | So... what we're really saying is that the majority of people want to enforce random punctuation characters based on their interpretation of the data on the cover, without regard to the title or any supporting documentation. Nice.  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Not random at all, Leiter. the Rules define how to handle episodic titles , as has been very adequately explained by Hal
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,640 |
| | Posted: | | | | While I don't know if anyone seriously suggested to use the copyright title, I'd like to point out that the Copyright Office would only be helpful for US titles.
Some other countries may have similar institutions that register movie titles, but many countries (including Sweden) has no copyright registration. All works are automatically copyright protected. Thus there is no official registration... | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 |  Posts: 1,536 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:
Quoting mreeder50:
Quote:
I agree with Skip that we should deal with them on a case by case instance. 
But that would require the use of (God forbid) common sense!
Common sense is NOT universal, Staid. Do we really have to esplain it again. Your version of Common Sense applies...only to you.
Skip That's why I wrote "would", and indicated that it would be forbidden by the highest authority. | | | | Hans |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Ah,  Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 16, 2007 | | Posts: 278 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
Not random at all, Leiter. the Rules define how to handle episodic titles , as has been very adequately explained by Hal
Skip You would be correct if the title were Terminator 4: Salvation; however, it clearly is not. Additionally, what if Terminator Salvation was intended to be a prequel? Given the loose timeline of the Terminator franchise, this is not unreasonable.  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | None of that is relevant to profiler, Leiter. As I have said I have no position, I can see both sides of the argument, so all I address is what the Rule says to do and Hal has very completely addressed that point.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Need help for another movies.
What are the original titles of the Lara Croft movies?
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider
or
Lara Croft Tomb Raider
And for the second:
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
or
Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
Thanks in advance. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Looks pretty obvious to me.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
Looks pretty obvious to me.
Skip Then talk to me!  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just apply the Rule
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider
Been that way since the day it was released.
I don't even see how it could be anything but.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
Just apply the Rule
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider
Been that way since the day it was released.
I don't even see how it could be anything but.
Skip That's how I also would make it, but wanted to hear another opinion. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | What I don't understand Virus is why somebody is always loojking to modify data which has been ciorrect, sometimes for years. I mean it is in the database properly and has been since the day it was released, so why?<shrugs>
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: January 1, 2009 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,087 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
What I don't understand Virus is why somebody is always loojking to modify data which has been ciorrect, sometimes for years. I mean it is in the database properly and has been since the day it was released, so why?<shrugs>
Skip Got a new DVD and in this profile was as original title "Tomb Raider 2: Lara Croft and the Cradle of Life", so why not correct it? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | The first thing I would look at on that virus is the the notes that should back up that Original title claim. Original Title is not something that i worry about over much, as it doesn't seem very useful to me 98% of the time. Personally I suspect that original title is probably bogus, if it's not it should have been backed up.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 810 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote:
...
Original Title is not something that i worry about over much, as it doesn't seem very useful to me 98% of the time. Personally I suspect that original title is probably bogus, if it's not it should have been backed up.
Skip We understand that, your collection is 98% Hollywood based English language films.  Those of us that collect films from outside of Hollywood find it far more useful.  pdf | | | Paul Francis
San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA |
|