Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next
Multiple cuts in one release
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
While it isn't terribly common to have multiple cuts of a movie on separate discs in one release, there are plenty of examples of it being done. For instance, we have the two-disc releases of Supergirl and Army of Darkness, the Criterion Collection release of Brazil, the Ultimate Editions of Legend and I Am Legend and several of the recent releases of Blade Runner. There doesn't seem to be a consistent way to handle these. Should they be box sets, with each version of the movie getting its own listing? If so, how should we handle special features discs?
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
In general, Ace, the answer is already in the Rules, essentially as we are instructed to use the longest version and the Boxsets are designed to deal with multiple titles, not the SAME one. However, at the same time, some of the releases you mentioned, most specifically Blade Runner were NOT anticipated when the Rules were developed and to this day I am not sure, myself how we should deal with those oddballs. A case can be made for the Boxset usage because there are sometimes differences in both Cast and Crew data lists, but are the differences substantial enough to warrant it.<shrugs> All that said, I think I'll sit back and watch and see if somebody presents something that makes sense.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
All of those except Blade Runner and I Am Legend were released before the current version of the rules. I don't see how this is a new situation.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Ok then Ace, if you don't see Blade Runner as any different from T2: UE, then follow the Rules. Problem solved. I don't see them the same way as I see a T2 or any of the ones that went before these two new "styles", particularly Blade Runner. But if you view them in the same light, then Rules apply as they were developed with multiple versions of the same title within one release.

T2 and MANY other such titles WERE released pre-Rules, so we did have some idea obviously. But particularly as represented by Blade Runner were not around and were not anticipated.

In which case I have to ask...why the poll, since the Rules deal with it. I supply you with the best answer I can see and explain it and then you come back and say there isn't a problem. It's simply a muti-version, single release title, do what the rules say.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
If it were me, I would handle them as bonus feature films sets...Parent profile for the main release and child profiles for the rest.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
OK, Unicus, let me ask you this. The purpose of the Bonus Feature Film, is to deal with films which may be the SAME title but NOT the same film. Such as Ben-Hur and Ben-Hur (1925). These fall outside of that parameter, so....give me an argument.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Jubal:
Quote:
Ok then Ace, if you don't see Blade Runner as any different from T2: UE, then follow the Rules. Problem solved. I don't see them the same way as I see a T2 or any of the ones that went before these two new "styles", particularly Blade Runner. But if you view them in the same light, then Rules apply as they were developed with multiple versions of the same title within one release.

T2 and MANY other such titles WERE released pre-Rules, so we did have some idea obviously. But particularly as represented by Blade Runner were not around and were not anticipated.

In which case I have to ask...why the poll, since the Rules deal with it. I supply you with the best answer I can see and explain it and then you come back and say there isn't a problem. It's simply a muti-version, single release title, do what the rules say.

Skip


Terminator 2: Ultimate Edition is different. The various cuts were on a single disc and thus it isn't possible to break them out into a box set. I don't see the difference between Blade Runner and my other examples, though. However, just because this situation already existed when the rules were written doesn't mean the rules deal with it. They don't. At least, any apparent dealing with it that they do is undermined by the rules modification to break out DVDs in Blu-ray sets and by numerous precedents.
 Last edited: by Ace_of_Sevens
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Ace, I don't agree with your premise. The DVD/BD issue you attempt to raise is TWO different formats  of the same film. The Rules do deal with multiple versions, evidently based on your poll not in the way you might like. So, instead of presenting arguments that aren't valid, like your DVD/BD argument, and given what I have explained about the Ben-Hur style of Profile. The only diffreence between blade Runner, T2 and most iother such releases is that with bklade Runner you have multiple cuts on DIFFERENT discs. Now this HAS been discussed before, BTW, why should we create  abunch of different Profiles for what amounts to the SAME movie. They are not different formats, they are not different movies with tjhe same title. As I see it Ace, you have only one possible argument, given the Rules, do the different cuts contain different Cast and Crew data, IF they do, then you may have an argument if they don't I can't imagine why we need 4 or 5 Profiles for the SAME data...to what end, just to separate the discs, you can do that locally if you want. But based on what you have said so far, Ace, I don't see your argument.

I am trying to see your logic, Ace, but so far, I don't.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorcvermeylen
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Belgium Posts: 1,946
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
Personally, I like the idea of having them as a boxset. As you said, Skip, there might be a difference in cast or crew. We're not allowed to enter actors from deleted scenes, but a deleted scene may be included in an alternate cut. I also like to have the info of the different runtimes of each cut. That is also something we lose by not having child profiles for all the cuts.

I know of at least one release that has been profiled and accepted as a boxset, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind: 30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition", UPC: 8712609600384. And before you AIM, SHOOT & KILL  , it's not one of my contributions 

But I am in favor of a rule change on these kind of releases.
View my collection at http://www.chriskepolis.be/home/dvd.htm

Chris
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAce_of_Sevens
Registered: December 10, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Posts: 3,004
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Don't read to much into this. My instinct was they shoudln't be boxsets, but several, like Brazil and Blade Runner were already accepted as such. Lots of people fired back when I complained about Blade Runner. I personally think this, or some other way of tracking multiple cuts, would be preferable to what we are doing now. I'm not arguing that's what the rules says and I haven't voted in the poll. I put this out there to let people weigh in.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTaro
Registered: February 23, 2009
Reputation: High Rating
Belgium Posts: 1,580
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:
If it were me, I would handle them as bonus feature films sets...Parent profile for the main release and child profiles for the rest.

Seems like the best solution to me. It has been done so in the Blu-ray releases of Blade Runner (same movie, different cuts) as well as When the Earth Stood Still (remake & original movie). In both cases the main movie was the parent profile and the additional cuts/movies were child profiles. That seems to be a working solution.
Blu-ray collection
DVD collection
My Games
My Trophies
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting cvermeylen:
Quote:
Personally, I like the idea of having them as a boxset. As you said, Skip, there might be a difference in cast or crew. We're not allowed to enter actors from deleted scenes, but a deleted scene may be included in an alternate cut. I also like to have the info of the different runtimes of each cut. That is also something we lose by not having child profiles for all the cuts.

I know of at least one release that has been profiled and accepted as a boxset, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind: 30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition", UPC: 8712609600384. And before you AIM, SHOOT & KILL  , it's not one of my contributions 

But I am in favor of a rule change on these kind of releases.

Chris:

Now for my next question. Are there differences in Cast and Crew? That's one thing. If not what is to be gained by having how ever many separate Profiles there are. I am waiting for Unicus, to give me an argument on his comment, maybe he has something that hasn't already been thought of. But at the moment, Chris, unless there IS a difference in Cast and Crew, I just don't see it. It doesn't fall within the parameters of the Boxset definition, nor does it fall within the parameters of the Ben-Hur issue. To setup- however many Profiles just because isn't enough of a rationale, I don't see anything to be gained by having 3, four or five Profiles of nearly identical data.

In fact, if I recall the last discussion on this correctly, my comment vis a vis how many duplicate profiles do we need, was brought up by another user and supported at the time. This strikes me at the moment of another whim of the week question. I really am, personally neutral on this, but just because simply isn't a solid rationale.

The Day the Earth Stood Still that Taro mentioned was a Ben-Hur type of issue, TWO DIFFERENT films the same name. The Rules don't provide for Different cuts of the same film as a Boxset. As of right now, the Blu-Ray Blade Runner he mentions is a violation of the Rules.

It's been awhile, Chris, Taro or whoever, since I looked but I believe that the Cast and Crew data for all cuts are identical.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
 Last edited: by Winston Smith
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDanae Cassandra
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Registered: May 26, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,878
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I can't speak for the others in your example, but the two versions of Brazil are two very different films.  Most of the rest of the DVDs I have that have two different versions included (often a rated & an unrated cut) do not have the vast differences of the two versions of Brazil (a good 48 minutes worth between them).  Also, with Brazil the packaging encourages you to view it as a box set, and give each disc a profile, since each is provided with a case.

So, I guess ultimately my opinion would be to handle it on a case-by-case basis.  If the two cuts (presented on two different discs, or on a flipper) are radically different, to the point where they can be seen as different films (Brazil) then include the child profile.  If they're not, then don't.

I also suspect that the vast majority will fall into the 'don't' group.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield
 Last edited: by Danae Cassandra
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Cass:

That isn't what the Rules say. For brazil, they say to use the longest cut, they don't allow for user-interpretation of 48 extra minutes makes it a totally different film.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDanae Cassandra
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Registered: May 26, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,878
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
True.  That's what makes this tricky.  As I added to the post above, I think most films are a 'don't' answer.  I have the Supergirl release, and I wouldn't consider treating it as a box set.

Maybe it's the packaging that that encourages one (and not just me, since I didn't create the profile) to treat Brazil as a box set.  The Criterion release in question is a slip case containing 3 keep cases (2 versions of the film, 1 documentary).  Each keep has a separate overview and everything.  Maybe if it was packaged in a single case, I would think of it differently, I don't know ... though the two films are very, very different ...
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield
 Last edited: by Danae Cassandra
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorLewis_Prothero
Strength Through Unity
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
Germany Posts: 6,730
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Danae Cassandra:
Quote:
SIf the two cuts (presented on two different discs, or on a flipper) are radically different, to the point where they can be seen as different films (Brazil) then include the child profile.  If they're not, then don't.


That's what the rules say too.
Quoting contribution rules:
Quote:
For branching titles, or those with multiple versions (e.g. Theatrical and Director's Cut) on the same disc, use the longest running time.

and regarding bonus films on multiple discs:
Quote:
Some examples of Bonus Feature Films are:
  • Previous movie versions, example "Ben-Hur: Four-Disc Collector's Edition" which includes the 1925 version.

  • Companion movie bonuses, example "Season of the Witch" which includes "There's Always Vanilla" from the same director.

  • Create the profile for the main feature in line with the standard Contribution Rules with the title of the Bonus Feature Film added to the Other Features field. Create a child profile for the "Bonus Feature Film" using the individual UPC if available or use Disc ID (read on a DVD-ROM) if not available.


    EDIT: The rules really don't leave much room for interpretation here.
    It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
    But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?


    Registrant since 05/22/2003
     Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero
        Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next